The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The collision between two electrons
Open accessAbstract
It is well-known that the problem of the collision between two particles interacting according to the inverse square law is exactly soluble on the wave mechanics, and that the solution yields the same scattering laws as the classical theory. If, however, the two particles are identical, e.g., two electrons or two α-particles, this is not necessarily the case; for the wave functions used must be antisymmetrical or symmetrical in the co-ordinates of the two particles; and this may affect the scattering laws. In this paper we shall discuss the collision between two particles possessing spin, such as electrons, and also between two particles without spin, such as α-particles. Assuming an inverse square law force between the particles, and neglecting the actual spin forces, we shall deduce from the symmetry properties of the wave functions a scattering law differing considerably from the classical. We shall also mention the various methods by which the effect could be observed, and give some experimental evidence in its favour. The application of the exclusion principle to collision problems has been discussed by the author in a previous paper. Suppose we wish to describe the motion of two particles interacting in any field of force. We obtain a solution w(r1 r2) of the wave equation, where r1 refers to the position of the first particle, and r2 to that of the second. If we did not use antisymmetrical wave functions, we should argue that the probability that the first particle should be at r1 and the second at r 2 would be |w (r1 r2)|2, and therefore the probability that one particle should be at r1 and the other at r2 would be |w (r1 r2)|2 + |w(r2 r1)|
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Inelastic Collisions of Fast Charged Particles with Atoms and Molecules—The Bethe Theory Revisited
INOKUTI, M. (1971) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.43.297 · Cited by 2,342
Nuclear Physics B. Nuclear Dynamics, Theoretical
Bethe, H. A. (1937) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.9.69 · Cited by 1,372
Inokuti, M., Itikawa, Y., & Turner, J. E. (1978) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.50.23 · Cited by 1,252
New model for electron-impact ionization cross sections of molecules
Hwang, W., Kim, Y.-K., & Rudd, M. E. (1996) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.471116 · Cited by 586
Electron-impact ionization cross sections of atmospheric molecules
Kim, Y.-K., Hwang, W., Weinberger, N. M., Ali, M. A., & Rudd, M. E. (1997) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.473186 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Mott, N. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1930-01-01
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 801
- Pages
- 259-267
- ISSN
- 0950-1207 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9150
- OpenAlex
- W2003207010
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The collision between two electrons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspa.1930.0006
- The paper
- Mott, N. F. (1930). The collision between two electrons. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1930.0006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.