The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The polarisation of electrons by double scattering
Open accessAbstract
1. In a previous paper the author has applied the relativistic theory of the electron due to Dirac to the problem of the scattering of electrons by atoms. The main purpose of the investigation was to discover whether any polarisation effect was to be expected when a beam of electrons was scattered by two successive targets. The experiment considered is illustrated in fig. 1. A beam of electrons LT1 is scattered by a target T1, and those that are scattered through a certain angle θ1, are allowed to fall on a second target T2. It was shown that the number of electrons scattered by this second target in any direction T2M making an angle θ2 with T1T2 depends on the angle Ф that the plane T1T2M makes with the plane LT1T2. Ф is taken to be zero when the electron follows the coplanar path LT1T2M. The number scattered along T2M is proportional to 1 + δ cos Φ, where δ is a positive constant depending on θ1, θ2. Thus more electrons are scattered along T2M than T2M' in the figure, the numbers being in the ratio 1 + δ :1 — δ. It should be noted that the theory deals with single nuclear scattering, and is therefore only applicable if the scattering targets are thin foils, sufficiently thin for multiple scattering to be negligible. In the paper quoted it was found that δ is extremely small unless the following conditions are satisfied.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sinova, J., Valenzuela, S. O., Wunderlich, J., Back, C. H., & Jungwirth, T. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.1213 · Cited by 3,117
Spin Selectivity in Electron Transmission Through Self-Assembled Monolayers of Double-Stranded DNA
Göhler, B., Hamelbeck, V., Markus, T. Z., Kettner, M., Hanne, G. F., Vager, Z., Naaman, R., & Zacharias, H. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1199339 · Cited by 952
Zur Bremsung rasch bewegter Teilchen beim Durchgang durch Materie
Bloch, F. (1933) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19334080303 · Cited by 867
Matrix Representation of Polarization
McMaster, W. H. (1961) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.33.8 · Cited by 310
Positron-Electron Differences in Energy Loss and Multiple Scattering
Rohrlich, F., & Carlson, B. C. (1954) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.93.38 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Mott, N. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1932-03-01
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 827
- Pages
- 429-458
- ISSN
- 0950-1207 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9150
- OpenAlex
- W2065434299
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The polarisation of electrons by double scattering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspa.1932.0044
- The paper
- Mott, N. F. (1932). The polarisation of electrons by double scattering. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1932.0044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.