The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Notes on the theory of radiation
Open accessAbstract
Abstract It will probably be agreed that among all the recent developments of the quantum theory, one of the least satisfactory is the theory of radiation. The present paper is intended as a preliminary to a new line of attack on the subject. It was begun some time ago, but owing to lack of success in carrying it to a conclusion, its publication has been much delayed. In the meantime other papers have appeared, which in some respects follow the same train of thought. The authors of these works have carried their methods further in some directions than I have attempted, but there is still perhaps room for the discussion of a number of questions from the rather different point of view adopted here. 1. The main principle of the present work is the idea that, since matter and light both possess the dual characters of particle and wave, a similar mathematical treatment ought to be applied to both, and that this has not yet bee done as fully as should be possible. Whereas we have a fairly complete calculus for dealing with the behaviour of any number of electrons or atoms, for photons the existing processes are much less satisfactory. The central difficulty, which makes it hard to apply the ordinary methods of wave mechanics to light, is the fact that (at least according to our present ideas) photons can be created and annihilated, and to represent this in a wave system we have to be able to think of a medium suddenly coming into existence and then going out again, when the light that it was carrying is absorbed. Such behaviour is a grave difficulty in the way of allowing us to think of the photon as a wave, and tends to make us think with more favour of its particle aspect, until we recall that after all it is quite unlike any known particle to come into existence and later to disappear without trace. The theories at present current, such as that of Heisenberg and Pauli, avoid these difficulties because they are mainly formal generalisations of the classical theory; this frees them from the above difficulties, but they pay for it in being highly abstract, and, as it has turned out, rather unsuccessful.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We write the charge-free Maxwell equations in a form analogous to that of the Dirac equation for a free electron.”
From Optical Dirac equation (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“There exist a variety of Dirac-like formulations of Maxwell ' s equations, but the most appropriate for our purposes is essentially that proposed by Darwin [27, 28] for a six-component ' spinor ' 1 ψ :”
From Optical Dirac equation (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
In the citing paper
“where each element in the matrix represents a 3 × 3 matrix.”
From Optical Dirac equation (2014) · cites this paper as [27]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Orbital angular momentum 25 years on [Invited]
Padgett, M. J. (2017) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.25.011265 · Cited by 829
From transverse angular momentum to photonic wheels
Aiello, A., Banzer, P., Neugebauer, M., & Leuchs, G. (2015) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.203 · Cited by 641
Die allgemeinen Prinzipien der Wellenmechanik
Pauli, W. E. F. (1933) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-52619-0_2 · Cited by 443
Advances in Full Control of Electromagnetic Waves with Metasurfaces
Zhang, L., Mei, S., Huang, K., & Qiu, C. (2016) · Advanced Optical Materials · doi:10.1002/adom.201500690 · Cited by 401
Optical angular-momentum flux*
Barnett, S. M. (2002) · Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics · doi:10.1088/1464-4266/4/2/361 · Cited by 291
Metadata
- Authors
- Darwin, C. G.
- Corresponding author
- Darwin, Charles Galton
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1932-05-02
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 829
- Pages
- 36-52
- ISSN
- 0950-1207 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9150
- OpenAlex
- W1985657646
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Keywords
- photons, wave-particle duality, quantum theory of light
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Notes on the theory of radiation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspa.1932.0065
- The paper
- Darwin, C. G. (1932). Notes on the theory of radiation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1932.0065