The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The electromagnetic equations of the supraconductor
Abstract
Electric currents are commonly believed to persist in a supra-conductor without being maintained by an electromagnetic field. Thus the relation between the field strength E and the current density J in a supraconductor has sometimes been described by means of an "acceleration equation," of the form ∆J = E; A = m/ne2. (1) This equation, which might replace Ohm;s law for supraconductors, simply expresses the influence of the electric part of the Lorentz force on freely movable electrons of the mass m and charge e, the number per cm3 being n (we use rational units). By definition the constant A must be positive. As a direct consequence of this equation (1) stationary currents in supraconductors are possible when E = 0. We shall see, however, that actually equation (1), which we will refer to as the "acceleration theory," implies more than is verified by experiment; moreover, presupposing an acceleration without any friction it implies a premature theory, the development of which has presented a hopelessly insoluble problem to mathematical physicist. Apparently a model was wanted which would explain that in its most stable state the supraconductor has always a persistent current. We shall give a formulation which is somewhat more restricted in this respect. On the other had it includes one more important fact, namely, the experiment of Meissner and Ochsenfeld. In this way we get a new description of the electromagnetic field in a supraconductor, which is consistent and, as it eliminates unnecessary statements, is in closer contact with experiment. This new description seems to provide an entirely new point of view for a theoretical explanation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bardeen, J., Cooper, L. N., & Schrieffer, J. R. (1957) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.108.1175 · Cited by 13,213
Inhomogeneous superconductivity in condensed matter and QCD
Casalbuoni, R., & Nardulli, G. (2004) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.76.263 · Cited by 666
Fluctuations near superconducting phase transitions
Skocpol, W. J., & Tinkham, M. (1975) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/38/9/001 · Cited by 531
Bardeen, J. (1956) · Encyclopedia of Physics / Handbuch der Physik · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-39773-2_9 · Cited by 417
Magnetic penetration depth in unconventional superconductors
Prozorov, R., & Giannetta, R. W. (2006) · Superconductor Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0953-2048/19/8/r01 · Cited by 400
Metadata
- Authors
- London, F., & London, H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A - Mathematical and Physical Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1935-03-01
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 866
- Pages
- 71-88
- ISSN
- 0080-4630 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9169
- OpenAlex
- W2133345131
- Cited by
- 954
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The electromagnetic equations of the supraconductor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspa.1935.0048
- The paper
- London, F., & London, H. (1935). The electromagnetic equations of the supraconductor. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A - Mathematical and Physical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1935.0048
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.