Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 7,307

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass

Penman, Howard Latimer·1948·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences

Abstract

Two theoretical approaches to evaporation from saturated surfaces are outlined, the first being on an aerodynamic basis in which evaporation is regarded as due to turbulent transport of vapour by a process of eddy diffusion, and the second being on an energy basis in which evaporation is regarded as one of the ways of degrading incoming radiation. Neither approach is new, but a combination is suggested that eliminates the parameter measured with most difficulty—surface temperature—and provides for the first time an opportunity to make theoretical estimates of evaporation rates from standard meteorological data, estimates that can be retrospective. Experimental work to test these theories shows that the aerodynamic approach is not adequate and an empirical expression, previously obtained in America, is a better description of evaporation from open water. The energy balance is found to be quite successful. Evaporation rates from wet bare soil and from turf with an adequate supply of water are obtained as fractions of that from open water, the fraction for turf showing a seasonal change attributed to the annual cycle of length of daylight. Finally, the experimental results are applied to data published elsewhere and it is shown that a satisfactory account can be given of open water evaporation at four widely spaced sites in America and Europe, the results for bare soil receive a reasonable check in India, and application of the results for turf shows good agreement with estimates of evaporation from catchment areas in the British Isles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspa.1948.0037

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Bowen I. S., 1926, P hys, Rev., 27, 779
  2. B run t D. 1939 Physical and dynamical meteorology. Camb. U niv. Press.
  3. 10.1103/PhysRev.30.527 · doi:10.1103/physrev.30.527
  4. 1936, Assoc. Intern. D'Hydrologie Sci. B ull., 142
  5. Fitzgerald D., 1886, Trans. Amer. Soc. Civ. Engrs, 15, 581, 10.1061/TACEAT.0000570 · doi:10.1061/taceat.0000570
  6. Kim H ., 1914, M on, Weath. Rev. Wash., 42, 474
  7. Lloyd D., 1942, Quart. J .R . M et, Soc., 66, 181
  8. Pasquill F., 1943, Proc. Roy, Soc. A, 182, 75
  9. Penm H ., 1940, Quart. J .R . M et, Soc., 66, 401
  10. Penm H ., 1941, J, Agric. Sci., 31, 454
  11. Penm H ., 1941, J, Agric. Sci., 31, 74
  12. Prescott J ., 1940, Trans. Roy. Soc. S . A ust., 64, 114
  13. 1931, M on, Weath. Rev. Wash., 59, 192
  14. Sutton O. G., 1934, Proc. Roy, Soc. A, 146, 701
  15. Sutton W. G. L., 1943, Proc. Roy, Soc. A, 182, 48
  16. Visentini M., 1936, See D avydov, Bull., 119

Cited by

See all 7,307

Metadata

Authors
Penman, H. L.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences
Published
1948-04-22
Volume
193
Issue
1032
Pages
120-145
ISSN
  • 0080-4630 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-9169
OpenAlex
W1969974566
Cited by
7,307
References
0
FWCI
21.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspa.1948.0037
The paper
Penman, H. L. (1948). Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1948.0037

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.