The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An utrasonic study of the area of contact between stationary and sliding surfaces
Abstract
This paper describes a novel attempt to determine quantitatively the area of contact between stationary and sliding contacts by means of an ultrasonic technique. The basic idea is to generate an ultrasonic wave in one body and measure the impulse passing into the second body through the interface. Analysis shows that the transmitted pulse depends on the elastic stiffness of the interface. According to theory the stiffness of a single circular contact is proportional to the diameter of the contact and not to its area and this has been confirmed by simple scaled-up experiments. Because of this the stiffness of multiple contacts is not determined unequivocally by the true area of contact. The scaled-up experiments show that for widely separated contacts the stiffness is the sum of the stiffnesses of the individual contacts; if they are close together it is determined primarily by the size of the embracing circle of contact. Only when the apparent area of contact is more than ten times the true area does the effect of the empty spaces on the stiffness become appreciable. The ultrasonic experiments confirm all these conclusions and the technique has been applied to the static contact between metals, between smooth and rough glass, between rubber and between polymers. In some cases the results are able to distinguish between elastic and plastic deformation in the contact zone. The technique has been extended to sliding contacts and the results show that with ductile materials junction growth may occur. Although the ultrasonic method suffers from the major disadvantage in that it cannot unequivocally distinguish between the true and the apparent area of contact it has the great advantage that, in contrast to electrical resistance measurements, it can be used for non-metals and is scarcely affected by the presence of oxide films. Again in contrast to optical methods, it can be used with opaque materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Transmission of seismic waves across single natural fractures
Pyrak‐Nolte, L. J., Myer, L. R., & Cook, N. G. W. (1990) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/jb095ib06p08617 · Cited by 678
Partial squeeze film levitation modulates fingertip friction
Wiertlewski, M., Fenton Friesen, R., & Colgate, J. E. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1603908113 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Kendall, K., & Tabor, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1971-06-22
- Volume
- 323
- Issue
- 1554
- Pages
- 321-340
- ISSN
- 0080-4630 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9169
- OpenAlex
- W2143922509
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An utrasonic study of the area of contact between stationary and sliding surfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspa.1971.0108
- The paper
- Kendall, K., & Tabor, D. (1971). An utrasonic study of the area of contact between stationary and sliding surfaces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1971.0108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.