The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review Paper: Continuum biomechanics of soft biological tissues
Abstract
Since its coming of age in the mid 1960s, continuum biomechanics has contributed much to our understanding of human health as well as to disease, injury, and their treatment. Nevertheless, biomechanics has yet to reach its full potential as a consistent contributor to the improvement of health–care delivery. Because of the inherent complexities of the microstructure and biomechanical behaviour of biological cells and tissues, there is a need for new theoretical frameworks to guide the design and interpretation of new classes of experiments. Because of continued advances in experimental technology, and the associated rapid increase in information on molecular and cellular contributions to behaviour at tissue and organ levels, there is a pressing need for mathematical models to synthesize and predict observations across multiple length– and time–scales. And because of the complex geometries and loading conditions, there is a need for new computational approaches to solve the boundaryand initial–value problems of clinical, industrial, and academic importance. Clearly, much remains to be done. The purpose of this paper is twofold: to review a few of the many achievements in the biomechanics of soft tissues and the tools that allowed them, but, more importantly, to identify some of the open problems that merit increased attention from those in applied mechanics, biomechanics, mathematics and mechanobiology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The chemical basis of morphogenesis
Turing, A. M. (1952) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1952.0012 · Cited by 11,733
Woo, S. L., Gomez, M. A., Sites, T. J., Newton, P. O., Orlando, C. A., & Akeson, W. H. (1987) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-198769080-00014 · Cited by 388
Cited by
Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Arterial Stiffening: Relevance in Development, Aging, and Disease
Lacolley, P., Regnault, V., Segers, P., & Laurent, S. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00003.2017 · Cited by 734
Constitutive modelling of arteries
Holzapfel, G. A., & Ogden, R. W. (2010) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2010.0058 · Cited by 528
A Review of Geometric Transformations for Nonrigid Body Registration
Holden, M. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2007.904691 · Cited by 369
An electrospun triphasic nanofibrous scaffold for bone tissue engineering
Catledge, S. A., Clem, W. C., Shrikishen, N., Chowdhury, S., Stanishevsky, A. V., Koopman, M., & Vohra, Y. K. (2007) · Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1088/1748-6041/2/2/013 · Cited by 167
Gilbert, H. T. J., Mallikarjun, V., Dobre, O., Jackson, M. R., Pedley, R., Gilmore, A. P., Richardson, S. M., & Swift, J. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-11923-1 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Humphrey, J. D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2003-01-08
- Volume
- 459
- Issue
- 2029
- Pages
- 3-46
- ISSN
- 1364-5021 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2946
- OpenAlex
- W1985233782
- Cited by
- 620
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review Paper: Continuum biomechanics of soft biological tissues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspa.2002.1060
- The paper
- Humphrey, J. D. (2003). Review Paper: Continuum biomechanics of soft biological tissues. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2002.1060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.