Cited by 859

Contagion in financial networks

Gai, Prasanna, Kapadia, Sujit·2010·Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Abstract

This paper develops an analytical model of contagion in financial networks with arbitrary structure. We explore how the probability and potential impact of contagion is influenced by aggregate and idiosyncratic shocks, changes in network structure and asset market liquidity. Our findings suggest that financial systems exhibit a robust-yet-fragile tendency: while the probability of contagion may be low, the effects can be extremely widespread when problems occur. And we suggest why the resilience of the system in withstanding fairly large shocks prior to 2007 should not have been taken as a reliable guide to its future robustness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspa.2009.0410

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The fractional threshold model measures the fraction of non-failed neighbors of a node's initial degree, and a node's failure depends on this fractional threshold.

    “Another approach, called fractional threshold, is more relevant to settings such as opinion formation, infrastructures and financial and economic settings, measures the fraction of non-failed (or activated in the context of opinion spreading) neighbors of a node’s initial degree. The decision regarding whether or not the node will fail depends on the fractional threshold11,29–31.”

    From Mitigation of cascading failures in complex networks (2020) · cites this paper as [30]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gai, P., & Kapadia, S.
Affiliations
  • Crawford School of Economics and Government, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
  • Bank of England, Threadneedle Street, London EC2R 8AH, UK
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2010-03-24
Volume
466
Issue
2120
Pages
2401-2423
ISSN
  • 1364-5021
  • 1471-2946
Cited by
859
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review