Cited by 21Quantum and Classical ElectrodynamicsOrbital Angular Momentum in OpticsPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research

Lateral and transverse shifts in reflected dipole radiation

Berry, M. V.·2011·Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Abstract

In-plane (lateral) and out-of-plane (transverse) shifts in the direction of arbitrarily polarized electromagnetic waves in a denser medium, reflected totally or partially at an interface with a rarer medium, are calculated exactly, in terms of the deviation of the Poynting vector from radial. The shifts are analogous to the Goos–Hänchen and Fedorov–Imbert shifts for beams. There is a transverse shift even for unreflected dipole radiation if the polarization is not linear. With reflection, there is a transverse shift for linear polarization, provided this is not pure transverse electric or transverse magnetic. The contributions from the geometrical ray, the lateral ray that interferes strongly with it, and the large peak at the Brewster angle (for transverse magnetic polarization), are calculated asymptotically far from the geometrical image. At the critical angle, the lowest order asymptotics is inadequate and a more sophisticated treatment is devised, reproducing the exact shifts accurately.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspa.2011.0081

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the generic q ≠ 1 case, rotational symmetry is absent, there is no AM conservation for light, and part of the optical AM is transferred to the medium.

    “In the generic q ≠ 1 case, the rotational symmetry is absent, there is no AM conservation for light, and part of the optical AM is transferred to the medium 119,120 .”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [119]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 21

Authors
Berry, M. V.
Affiliations
H H Wills Physics Laboratory, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TL, UK
Corresponding author
Berry, M. V.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2011-03-23
Volume
467
Issue
2133
Pages
2500-2519
ISSN
  • 1364-5021 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2946
OpenAlex
W2107339267
Cited by
21
References
25
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
Keywords
dipole radiation, lateral displacement, transverse shift, Goos-Hänchen shift, total internal reflection, partial reflection, polarization dependence, polarization angle, critical angle, asymptotic analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review