A theory of anisotropic healing and damage mechanics of materials
Abstract
Self-healing smart materials have emerged into the research arena and have been deployed in industrial and biomedical applications, in which the modelling techniques and predicting schemes are crucial for designers to optimize these smart materials. In practice, plastic deformation is coupled with damage and healing in these systems, which necessitates a coupled formulation for characterization. The thermodynamics of inelastic deformation, damage and healing processes are incorporated here to establish the coupled constitutive equations for healing materials. This thermodynamic consistent formulation provides the designers with the ability to predict the irregular inelastic deformation of glassy polymers and damage and healing patterns for a highly anisotropic self-healing system. Moreover, the lack of a physically consistent method to measure and calibrate the healing process in the literature is addressed here. Within the continuum damage mechanics (CDM) framework, the physics of damage and healing processes is used to introduce the healing effect into the CDM concept and a set of two new anisotropic damage–healing variables are derived. These novel damage–healing variables together with the proposed thermodynamic consistent coupled theory constitute a well-structured method for accurately predicting the degradation and healing mechanisms in material systems. The inelastic and damage response for a shape memory polymer-based self-healing system is captured herein. While the healing experimental results are limited in the literature, the proposed theory provides the mathematical competency to capture the most nonlinear responses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The healing processes of the thermoplastic particle/SMP system have been modeled systematically by Li's research group.
“The healing processes have been modeled systematically by Li's research group [184,187].”
From A review of stimuli-responsive shape memory polymer composites (2013) · cites this paper as [184]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 105
- Authors
- Voyiadjis, G. Z., Shojaei, A., Li, G., & Kattan, P. I.
- Affiliations
- Louisiana State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Voyiadjis, George Z.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2011-08-31
- Volume
- 468
- Issue
- 2137
- Pages
- 163-183
- ISSN
- 1364-5021 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2946
- OpenAlex
- W2126963239
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 7.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Mechanical Behavior of Composites
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
- Keywords
- self-healing materials, anisotropic damage, continuum damage mechanics, thermodynamic consistency, inelastic deformation, shape memory polymers, glassy polymers, material nonlinearity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review