Cited by 105Polymer composites and self-healingMechanical Behavior of CompositesElasticity and Material Modeling

A theory of anisotropic healing and damage mechanics of materials

Voyiadjis, George Z., Shojaei, Amir, Li, Guoqiang, Kattan, Peter I.·2012·Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Abstract

Self-healing smart materials have emerged into the research arena and have been deployed in industrial and biomedical applications, in which the modelling techniques and predicting schemes are crucial for designers to optimize these smart materials. In practice, plastic deformation is coupled with damage and healing in these systems, which necessitates a coupled formulation for characterization. The thermodynamics of inelastic deformation, damage and healing processes are incorporated here to establish the coupled constitutive equations for healing materials. This thermodynamic consistent formulation provides the designers with the ability to predict the irregular inelastic deformation of glassy polymers and damage and healing patterns for a highly anisotropic self-healing system. Moreover, the lack of a physically consistent method to measure and calibrate the healing process in the literature is addressed here. Within the continuum damage mechanics (CDM) framework, the physics of damage and healing processes is used to introduce the healing effect into the CDM concept and a set of two new anisotropic damage–healing variables are derived. These novel damage–healing variables together with the proposed thermodynamic consistent coupled theory constitute a well-structured method for accurately predicting the degradation and healing mechanisms in material systems. The inelastic and damage response for a shape memory polymer-based self-healing system is captured herein. While the healing experimental results are limited in the literature, the proposed theory provides the mathematical competency to capture the most nonlinear responses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspa.2011.0326

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The healing processes of the thermoplastic particle/SMP system have been modeled systematically by Li's research group.

    “The healing processes have been modeled systematically by Li's research group [184,187].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 105

Authors
Voyiadjis, G. Z., Shojaei, A., Li, G., & Kattan, P. I.
Affiliations
Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Voyiadjis, George Z.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2011-08-31
Volume
468
Issue
2137
Pages
163-183
ISSN
  • 1364-5021 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2946
OpenAlex
W2126963239
Cited by
105
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Mechanical Behavior of Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
Keywords
self-healing materials, anisotropic damage, continuum damage mechanics, thermodynamic consistency, inelastic deformation, shape memory polymers, glassy polymers, material nonlinearity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review