Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 434

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A theory of drug action based on the rate of drug-receptor combination

Paton, William Drummond Macdonald·1961·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences

Abstract

A theory of drug action is developed on the assumption that excitation by a stimulant drug is proportional to the rate of drug-receptor combination, rather than to the proportion of receptors occupied by the drug. The properties of a drug can then be specified by two rate constants: k1, the association rate constant, and k2, the dissociation rate constant; the ratio k2/k1 ═ ke corresponds to the reciprocal of the ‘affinity’. The value of ke then determines potency, and k2 determines whether the drug is a powerful stimulant (k2 high), a partial agonist with ability both to excite and to antagonize (k2 moderate) or an antagonist with vestiges of stimulant action (k2 low). Qualitatively such a theory accounts for the persistence of effect of an antagonist on a tissue; for the characteristic sequence of excitation followed by block with drugs such as nicotine; for certain forms of tachyphylaxis; and for the vestiges of stimulant action possessed by classical antagonists. The theory has been tested on the guinea-pig ileum with acetylcholine and histamine as agonists, hyoscine, mepyramine and atropine as antagonists and alkyltrimethylammonium compounds as partial agonists, and it was corroborated in the following respects: 1. The dose-response curve of acetylcholine or histamine has the predicted form, if it is determined with an auxotonic rather than with an isotonic lever. 2. The rates of offset and of onset of antagonism, expressed in terms of change of receptor occupation by the antagonist, follow an exponential course from which k1 and k2 can be measured. Values of k2/k1 so obtained agree with those obtained from the intensity of antagonism at equilibrium. The rate of onset of action increases in proportion to the antagonistic dose ratio finally achieved. The rate of offset of action is independent of the intensity of the antagonism or of the time taken to achieve it, up to dose ratios of 20 to 100. Diffusion barriers do not appear to contribute significantly to the time course of action of drugs such as hyoscine or mepyramine except at high dosage. 3. With the alkyltrimethylammonium compounds (hexyl to dodecyl): (a) the rate of onset and offset of antagonistic action fell with increasing potency. (b) The excitation produced always reached a peak response soon after injection which faded thereafter to a lower equilibrium value, with a time constant comparable with that predicted from the atropinic action. The rate and proportion of fade increased with dose. The dose-response curve for peak responses is bell-shaped, but not that for equilibrium responses. (c) The slope of the foot of the dose-response curves of the series and the magnitude of the maximum equilibrium responses correlated with the estimates of k1 and k2, respectively, obtained from analysis of the atropinic action. The alkyltrimethylammonium compounds could be specified by a k1 which is constant and a k2 diminishing by a factor of about 2∙5 for each methylene group added. It is suggested that association is determined by the cationic head, and dissociation by shorter-range binding forces. 4. The responses to strong stimulants, such as histamine or acetylcholine, cannot be fully described in these terms. Following exposure to them the ileum is non-specifically desensitized. This desensitization is detectable with small doses, increases with dose and duration of exposure, and differs in its course to recovery from a specific antagonism. 5. A similar desensitization follows the removal of potassium from the fluid in which the ileum is immersed, and the two forms of desensitization summate. If potassium-free solution is applied rapidly, a contraction of the ileum occurs, indistinguishable from that due to acetylcholine. It is suggested as a working hypothesis of stimulant action that the drug ion exchanges with potassium at the receptor, and is then released from the receptor in exchange for potassium derived intracellularly, so that the chemoceptive action involves an extraction of potassium from the tissue. The implications of rate theory and of non-specific desensitization for theories of drug action are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.1961.0020

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 434

Metadata

Authors
Paton, W. D. M.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences
Published
1961-04-18
Volume
154
Issue
954
Pages
21-69
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-9193
OpenAlex
W2078565276
Cited by
434
References
1
FWCI
7.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A theory of drug action based on the rate of drug-receptor combination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.1961.0020
The paper
Paton, W. D. M. (1961). A theory of drug action based on the rate of drug-receptor combination. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1961.0020

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.