The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Organization of the primate retina: electron microscopy
Abstract
The retinae of monkey and man have been studied by electron microscopy to identify cell types, their processes and synaptic contacts. In the inner plexiform layer, the morphological characteristics of the three types of cells (bipolar, ganglion and amacrine) are described and seven synaptic relationships are identified. The bipolar terminals contain ribbons at points of synaptic contact, and, at these points, there are typically two postsynaptic processes, one a ganglion cell dendrite, the other an amacrine cell process. This synaptic arrangement is here termed a dyad. The amacrine cell processes themselves make synaptic contacts with ganglion cell dendrites and somata, other amacrine cell processes, and, most frequently, with the bipolar cell terminals. Often, the amacrine-bipolar contact is adjacent to a bipolar-amacrine junction, forming a reciprocal synaptic arrangement between the bipolar and the amacrine. In the more peripheral retina, large bipolar cell terminals (probably of rod bipolars) are occasionally observed adjacent to the perikarya of the ganglion cells. At these junctions, areas of fusion between the plasma membranes are seen, suggesting that such axosomatic junctions could be electrical. In the outer plexiform layer, synapses have been identified only in the receptor cell bases where receptor cells contact bipolar and horizontal cell processes. Synaptic contacts of the horizontal cells have not been clearly identified, but their strategic terminations in the receptor cell ending are described and interpreted as possibly synaptic. A model of the retina, based on the described anatomy, is presented and correlated with ganglion cell physiology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N., & Brenner, S. (1986) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1986.0056 · Cited by 5,589
Modern Image Quality Assessment
Wang, Z., & Bovik, A. C. (2006) · Synthesis Lectures on Image, Video, and Multimedia Processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-02238-8 · Cited by 967
Eye Smarter than Scientists Believed: Neural Computations in Circuits of the Retina
Gollisch, T., & Meister, M. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.12.009 · Cited by 795
Rall, W., & Shepherd, G. M. (1968) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1968.31.6.884 · Cited by 710
The structure of the ventral nerve cord of Caenorhabditis elegans
White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N., & Brenner, S. (1976) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1976.0086 · Cited by 616
Metadata
- Authors
- Dowling, J. E., & Boycott, B. B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1966-11-15
- Volume
- 166
- Issue
- 1002
- Pages
- 80-111
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9193
- OpenAlex
- W2036453841
- Cited by
- 1,033
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organization of the primate retina: electron microscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.1966.0086
- The paper
- Dowling, J. E., & Boycott, B. B. (1966). Organization of the primate retina: electron microscopy. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1966.0086
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.