The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Gametogenesis and fertilization in Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis : a transmission electron microscope study
Abstract
The ultrastructure of the micro- and macro-gametocytes of Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis and the nuclear and cytoplasmic changes during gametogenesis and fertilization were examined with the electron microscope. Osmiophilic bodies, dispersed in the cytoplasm, served to distinguish the gametocytes from other erythrocytic stages and were thought to play a part in the gametocytes’ escape from the host cells by attachment to the parasite’s plasmalemma causing dissolution of the overlying erythrocyte cytoplasm. Macrogametocytes were distinguished from the microgametocytes by their greater density of ribosomes, more elaborate endoplasmic reticulum, which contained electron dense material, more numerous mitochondria and smaller nucleus. In microgametogenesis nuclear division was endomitotic and the genome was segregated on three successive spindle formations. Microtubule organizing centres developed adjacent to the nuclear envelope and gave rise to orthogonal tetrads of kinetosomes which were found at opposite poles of the first nuclear spindle. Axoneme assembly from the kinetosome followed the usual pattern by the addition of sub-units terminally on to the A subfibres, and, with a slight lag, on to the B subfibres. The kinetosomes were closely linked to centriolar plaques in pores of the nuclear envelope, at the spindle poles. The attachment of the kinetosomes and their axonemes to the spindle poles provided the mechanism by which each haploid set of chromosomes was eventually endowed with a single axoneme. At the time of the final nuclear segregation the kinetosome and a newly formed juxta-kinetosomal sphere and granule became surrounded by a basket work of irregular tubules which lay close to a bud of the nucleus containing a spindle pole and the now highly condensed chromatin. During exflagellation the juxta-kinetosomal sphere and granule, together with the kinetosome and axoneme were forced through the perikinetosomal basket perpendicularly towards the surface and distended the plasmalemma. In the final stages of gamete formation, the gamete slid off tangentially to the surface and the nuclear bud also passed through the perikinetosomal basket, became separated from the main body of nucleoplasm and was incorporated as the nucleus of the gamete. The free microgamete contained a single axoneme with its kinetosome and distal juxta-kinetosomal sphere and granule. The condensed nucleus was intertwined with the axoneme. After emergence from the erythrocyte there were contrastingly few changes in the macrogamete. The absence of intranuclear spindles and maturation bodies provided evidence that meiosis did not occur at this stage. At fertilization one pole of the microgamete was closely applied to the surface of the macrogamete, and amorphous material on the outer surfaces became confluent. This allowed contact and fusion of the plasmalemmas. The naked axoneme and the nucleus of the microgamete passed into the cytoplasm of the macrogamete. Decondensation of the microgamete chromatin may have occurred before fusion of the two nuclei. A chromosome number of about ten was estimated for the microgametes from numbers of kinetochores and microtubules in the intranuclear spindles. This accords with the estimate for the sporogonic stages. The perikinetosomal basket and juxta-kinetosomal sphere and granule have not been described previously in malaria parasites. The former may have a skeletal function in directing the axoneme and nuclear bud towards the surface. The latter, in their position at the distal end of the microgamete may assist in the penetration of the macrogamete by mediating the fusion of the plasmalemmas of the two gametes, though we have not been able to determine that the kinetosomal end is that one which contacts the macrogamete.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ciliogenesis: building the cell's antenna
Ishikawa, H., & Marshall, W. F. (2011) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm3085 · Cited by 961
The evolution, metabolism and functions of the apicoplast
Lim, L., & McFadden, G. I. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0273 · Cited by 356
Liu, Y., Tewari, R., Ning, J., Blagborough, A. M., Garbom, S., Pei, J., Grishin, N. V., Steele, R. E., Sinden, R. E., Snell, W. J., et al. (2008) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1656508 · Cited by 320
Self-citationSayers, C., Pandey, V., Balakrishnan, A., Michie, K., Svedberg, D., Hunziker, M., Pardo, M., Choudhary, J., Berntsson, R., & Billker, O. (2024) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2024.10.008 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Sinden, R. E., Canning, E. U., & Spain, B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1976-03-30
- Volume
- 193
- Issue
- 1110
- Pages
- 55-76
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9193
- OpenAlex
- W1993051795
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gametogenesis and fertilization in Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis : a transmission electron microscope study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.1976.0031
- The paper
- Sinden, R. E., Canning, E. U., & Spain, B. (1976). Gametogenesis and fertilization in Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis : a transmission electron microscope study. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1976.0031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.