The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Profiles of water content and pore size in Sphagnum and peat, and their relation to peat bog ecology
Abstract
The bog mosses, Sphagnum, form a significant part of the total mass of plants in the world. Their rate of growth depends to a considerable extent on the supply of water to them, and different species occupy characteristic habitats which differ in their ability to supply water. We used the profiles of water content in almost undisturbed cores of two species to infer the size and distribution of spaces around the plants in an attempt to account for the observation that S. papillosum is usually found not far above the water table, while S. capillifolium is usually found on hummocks well above the water table. Profiles of water content were recorded non-destructively from 30 cm diameter cores of Sphagnum and underlying peat, with use of the absorbance of the soft gamma radiation of 241Am. The distribution of water-fillable spaces of different size was inferred from profiles with the water table at different distances, to a maximum of 150 cm, below the surface. The larger spaces, which are the main path of water transport, are outside the plant cell walls: between leaves and between pendent branches and stems. The mean radius of such spaces around the hummock species S. capillifolium is smaller than that around S. papillosum. For a given depth of water table the water content of the apical tuft of branches, where growth occurs, is greater in the hummock species than it is in the lawn species. Of ecological importance is that, for a given water content in the apex, the water table is at a greater depth below the hummock species than it is below the lawn species. As the water table rises and falls, so the water content of both species shows hysteresis as large as the difference between them. The ecological significance of this and the need for measurements while water is flowing are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Investigation of the Biotic Factors Determining the Rates of Plant Decomposition on Blanket Bog
Coulson, J. C., & Butterfield, J. (1978) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2259155 · Cited by 257
Schofield, R. K. (1935) · Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository) · Cited by 107
Cited by
Hydrological feedbacks in northern peatlands
Waddington, J. M., Morris, P. J., Kettridge, N., Granath, G., Thompson, D. K., & Moore, P. A. (2015) · Ecohydrology · doi:10.1002/eco.1493 · Cited by 498
Vegetational gradients in relation to environmental conditions in northwestern European mires
Malmer, N. (1986) · Canadian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1139/b86-054 · Cited by 288
Effects of water level alteration on carbon cycling in peatlands
Zhong, Y., Jiang, M., & Middleton, B. A. (2020) · Ecosystem Health and Sustainability · doi:10.1080/20964129.2020.1806113 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Hayward, P. M., & Clymo, R. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1982-06-22
- Volume
- 215
- Issue
- 1200
- Pages
- 299-325
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9193
- OpenAlex
- W2004848678
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Profiles of water content and pore size in Sphagnum and peat, and their relation to peat bog ecology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.1982.0044
- The paper
- Hayward, P. M., & Clymo, R. S. (1982). Profiles of water content and pore size in Sphagnum and peat, and their relation to peat bog ecology. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1982.0044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.