Models of evolution
Abstract
Different ways in which evolution can be modelled will be reviewed. Two asexual models - ‘Muller’s ratchet’ and a model due to Eigen and Schuster - both lead to the conclusion that the accuracy of replication must reach a limiting value, but the details are different. In classic population genetics models, difficulties arise if fitnesses depend on interactions with others. Two approaches - ‘trait group’ methods, and game theory - are discussed. If the interacting individuals are relatives, there is again a choice between the exact ‘neighbour-modulated fitness’ approach and the more intuitive ‘inclusive fitness’ method. A more drastic change in the nature of the model arises if the units of the evolving system are not individual organisms, but either genes or species. There are conceptual difficulties which must be clarified before species selection can be analysed mathematically.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The first problem prebiotic systems faced was transgressing the information threshold, i.e., escaping Eigen's paradox.
“The first such problem that prebiotic systems may have faced was transgressing the information threshold, i.e., escaping Eigen’s paradox.”
From Ecology and Evolution in the RNA World Dynamics and Stability of Prebiotic Replicator Systems (2017) · cites this paper as [46]
Eigen's Paradox: there is no accurate replicase without a large genome and no large genome without an accurate replicase.
“This result yields Eigen’s Paradox [46]: there is no accurate replicase without a large genome and there could be no large genome without an accurate replicase.”
From Ecology and Evolution in the RNA World Dynamics and Stability of Prebiotic Replicator Systems (2017) · cites this paper as [46]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 124
- Authors
- Smith, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, John Maynard
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1983-10-22
- Volume
- 219
- Issue
- 1216
- Pages
- 315-325
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9193
- OpenAlex
- W2066582149
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
- Keywords
- Muller's ratchet, replication accuracy, population genetics, game theory, inclusive fitness, kin selection, species selection, gene selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review