The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Primary production and photoadaptation in light- and shade-adapted colonies of the symbiotic coral, stylophora pistillata
Abstract
Photoadaptation by photosynthetic organisms to lowered light intensities occurs in part through changes in pigment concentrations and in characteristics of the photosynthetic response curve. We have characterized photoadaptive responses of light- and shade-adapted colonies of the reef coral Stylophora pistillata, which possesses symbiotic algae (zooxanthellae) and grows naturally under a variety of light intensities in the highly cavernous reefs of the Red Sea. Shade-adapted corals have significantly more chlorophyll per individual zooxanthella cell than light-adapted corals (2.98 compared to 12.97 pg chlorophyll a per cell), but not a significantly different number of cells per unit area (1.00 × 106 cells per square centimetre), with the result that the mass of chlorophyll per unit area is greater for shade-adapted corals than for light-adapted corals. Tissue nitrogen content per unit area is significantly lower (p < 0.05) in shade-adapted corals, correlating with a decrease in polyp density (0.10 > p > 0.05) in shade forms. These biomass characteristics are concomitant with a variety of functional responses to natural light intensities. Rate of photosynthesis at saturating light intensities is the same per unit area in both forms (20.2 µgO2cm-2 h-1 for shade specimens; 18.8 for light specimens); but it is significantly different when measured by amount of chlorophyll (1.6 µg O2 (chl a)-1 h-1 for shade specimens compared with 5.0 for light specimens). The initial slope of the P: I curve, α, is significantly higher for shade specimens by area (0.21 for shade corals compared with 0.12 for light corals), but significantly lower for shade specimens by amount of chlorophyll a (0.01 for specimens from shade compared to 0.04 for specimens growing in the light). Ik (the point at which maximum production begins) is significantly lower for shade specimens (138 µmol m-2 s-1 for shade compared to 273 for light), and likewise Ic (the compensation point at which net coral photosynthesis = 0) is also significantly less for shade specimens (30 µmol m-2 s-1 for shade compared to 141 for light). The average nocturnal respiration rate is significantly higher for specimens growing in the light (13.9 µg O2 cm-2 h-1 for light specimens compared to 7.6 for shade specimens). Corals in intense sunlight respire at almost twice the rate of shade corals, probably in response to their higher total gross production. Owing to higher production rates and lower respiration rates, integrated Pc (gross)/Rc (24 h) ratios are greater for shade-adapted specimens either in direct sunlight (1.76 P/R for shade specimens in the light compared to 1.10 for light specimens in the light), or in the shade (0.43 for shade specimens in the cave compared to 0.10 for light specimen in the cave). By using previously defined equations and biomass assumptions, it can be shown that light-adapted Stylophora pistillata can acquire all of their basal metabolic carbon through photosynthesis and translocation, but that shade-adapted Stylophora colonies growing in shade acquire slightly less than half. These results also show that if there were no photoadaptive response, shade-adapted specimens would acquire less than 4 % of their carbon from photosynthesis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Heterotrophy in Tropical Scleractinian Corals
Houlbrèque, F., & Ferrier‐Pagès, C. (2009) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2008.00058.x · Cited by 771
Light and the Bioenergetics of a Symbiotic Coral
Falkowski, P. G., Dubinsky, Z., Muscatine, L., & Porter, J. W. (1984) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1309663 · Cited by 648
Self-citationHoegh-Guldberg, O., & Smith, G. J. (1989) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/0022-0981(89)90109-3 · Cited by 552
Lesser, M. P., Stochaj, W. R., Tapley, D. W., & Shick, J. M. (1990) · Coral Reefs · doi:10.1007/bf00265015 · Cited by 511
Muscatine, L., Falkowski, P. G., Porter, J. W., & Dubinsky, Z. (1984) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1984.0058 · Cited by 484
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Porter, J. W., Muscatine, L., Dubinsky, Z., & Falkowski, P. G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1984-12-31
- Volume
- 222
- Issue
- 1227
- Pages
- 161-180
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9193
- OpenAlex
- W2075797127
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Primary production and photoadaptation in light- and shade-adapted colonies of the symbiotic coral, stylophora pistillata. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.1984.0057
- The paper
- Porter, J. W., Muscatine, L., Dubinsky, Z., & Falkowski, P. G. (1984). Primary production and photoadaptation in light- and shade-adapted colonies of the symbiotic coral, stylophora pistillata. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1984.0057
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.