The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phylogeny of Wolbachia in filarial nematodes
Open accessAbstract
Intracellular bacteria have been observed in various species of filarial nematodes (family Onchocercidae). The intracellular bacterium of the canine filaria Dirofilaria immitis has been shown to be closely related to Wolbachia, a rickettsia-like micro-organism that is widespread among arthropods. However, the relationships between endosymbionts of different filariae, and between these and the arthropod wolbachiae, appear not to have been studied. To address these issues we have examined ten species of filarial nematodes for the presence of Wolbachia. For nine species, all samples examined were PCR positive using primers specific for the ftsZ gene of Wolbachia. For one species, the examined samples were PCR negative. Sequences of the amplified ftsZ gene fragments of filarial wolbachiae fall into two clusters (C and D), which are distinct from the A and B clusters recognized for arthropod wolbachiae. These four lineages (A-D) are related in a star-like phylogeny, with higher nucleotide divergence observed between C and D wolbachiae than that observed between A and B wolbachiae. In addition, within each of the two lineages of filarial wolbachiae, the phylogeny of the symbionts is consistent with the host phylogeny. Thus, there is no evidence for recent Wolbachia transmission between arthropods and nematodes. Endosymbiont 16S ribosomal DNA sequences from a subset of filarial species support these findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dumler, J. S., Barbet, A. F., Bekker, C. P., Dasch, G. A., Palmer, G. H., Ray, S. C., Rikihisa, Y., & Rurangirwa, F. R. (2001) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00207713-51-6-2145 · Cited by 2,089
Multilocus Sequence Typing System for the Endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis
Baldo, L., Dunning Hotopp, J. C., Jolley, K. A., Bordenstein, S. R., Biber, S. A., Choudhury, R. R., Hayashi, C., Maiden, M. C. J., Tettelin, H., & Werren, J. H. (2006) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00731-06 · Cited by 870
Hurst, G. D. D., & Jiggins, F. M. (2005) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3056 · Cited by 855
Removing symbiotic Wolbachia bacteria specifically inhibits oogenesis in a parasitic wasp
Dedeine, F., Vavre, F., Fleury, F., Loppin, B., Hochberg, M. E., & Boulétreau, M. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.101304298 · Cited by 489
Wolbachia.Bacterial Endosymbionts of Filarial Nematodes
Taylor, M. J., Bandi, C., & Hoerauf, A. (2005) · Advances in Parasitology · doi:10.1016/s0065-308x(05)60004-8 · Cited by 425
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bandi, C., Anderson, T. J. C., Genchi, C., & Blaxter, M. L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1998-12-22
- Volume
- 265
- Issue
- 1413
- Pages
- 2407-2413
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2014467433
- Cited by
- 578
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogeny of Wolbachia in filarial nematodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.1998.0591
- The paper
- Bandi, C., Anderson, T. J. C., Genchi, C., & Blaxter, M. L. (1998). Phylogeny of Wolbachia in filarial nematodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0591
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.