The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantified interference and diffraction in single Morpho butterfly scales
Open accessAbstract
Brilliant iridescent colouring in male butterflies enables long–range conspecific communication and it has long been accepted that microstructures, rather than pigments, are responsible for this coloration. Few studies, however, explicitly relate the intra–scale microstructures to overall butterfly visibility, both in terms of reflected and transmitted intensities and viewing angles. Using a focused–laser technique, we investigated the absolute reflectivity and transmissivity associated with the single–scale microstructures of two species of Morpho butterfly and the mechanisms behind their remarkable wide–angle visibility. Measurements indicate that certain Morpho microstructures reflect up to 75% of the incident blue light over an angle range of greater than 100° in one plane and 15° in the other. We show that incorporation of a second layer of more transparent scales, above a layer of highly iridescent scales, leads to very strong diffraction, and we suggest this effect acts to increase further the angle range over which incident light is reflected. Measurements using index-matching techniques yield the complex refractive index of the cuticle material comprising the single–scale microstructure to be n = (1.56+0.01) + (0.06 ±0.01)i. This figure is required for theoretical modelling of such microstructure systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Han, L., & Che, S. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201705708 · Cited by 624
Pointillist structural color in Pollia fruit
Vignolini, S., Rudall, P. J., Rowland, A. V., Reed, A., Moyroud, E., Faden, R. B., Baumberg, J. J., Glover, B. J., & Steiner, U. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1210105109 · Cited by 586
Mechanisms and behavioural functions of structural coloration in cephalopods
Mäthger, L. M., Denton, E. J., Marshall, N. J., & Hanlon, R. T. (2009) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0366.focus · Cited by 346
Stavenga, D. G., Leertouwer, H. L., & Wilts, B. D. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.098673 · Cited by 107
Pouya, C., & Vukusic, P. (2012) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2011.0091 · Cited by 39
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Vukusic, P., Sambles, J. R., Lawrence, C. R., & Wootton, R. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1999-07-22
- Volume
- 266
- Issue
- 1427
- Pages
- 1403-1411
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2041718488
- Cited by
- 591
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantified interference and diffraction in single Morpho butterfly scales. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.1999.0794
- The paper
- Vukusic, P., Sambles, J. R., Lawrence, C. R., & Wootton, R. J. (1999). Quantified interference and diffraction in single Morpho butterfly scales. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0794
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.