Cited by 219Wildlife Ecology and ConservationRangeland and Wildlife ManagementPasture and Agricultural Systems

The allometry of patch selection in ruminants

Open access
Wilmshurst, John F., Fryxell, John M., Bergman, Carita M.·2000·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

An axiomatic feature of food consumption by animals is that intake rate and prey abundance are positively related. While this has been demonstrated rigorously for large herbivores, it is apparent from patch selection trials that grazers paradoxically tend to prefer short, sparse swards to tall, dense swards. Indeed, migratory herbivores often shift from areas of high to low sward biomass during the growing season. As nutritional quality is an inverse function of grass abundance, herbivores appear to sacrifice short-term intake for nutritional gains obtainable by eating sparse forage of higher quality. Explicit models of this trade-off suggest that individual ruminants maximize daily rates of energy gain by choosing immature swards of intermediate biomass. As body mass is related positively to both ruminant cropping rates and digestibility, there should be an allometric link between grass abundance and energy maximization, providing a tool for predicting patterns of herbivore habitat selection. We used previously published studies to develop a synthetic model of trade-offs between forage abundance and quality predicting that optimal sward biomass should scale allometrically with body size. The model predicts size-related variation in habitat selection observed in a guild of grazing ungulates in the Serengeti ecosystem.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2000.1007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilmshurst, J. F., Fryxell, J. M., & Bergman, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Guelph (CA)
Corresponding author
Wilmshurst, John F.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
2000-02-22
Volume
267
Issue
1441
Pages
345-349
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W1975440005
Cited by
219
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
13.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pretoria
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
Keywords
patch selection, allometry, ruminants, forage availability, forage quality, energy gain, body size, habitat selection, Serengeti
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Weight, Cattle, Eating, Models, Biological, Ruminants, Species Specificity, Biomass

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review