Cited by 35Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMultisensory perception and integrationVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Blind subjects construct conscious mental images of visual scenes encoded in musical form

Open access
Cronly–Dillon, J., Persaud, K. C., Blore, R.·2000·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Blind (previously sighted) subjects are able to analyse, describe and graphically represent a number of high-contrast visual images translated into musical form de novo. We presented musical transforms of a random assortment of photographic images of objects and urban scenes to such subjects, a few of which depicted architectural and other landmarks that may be useful in navigating a route to a particular destination. Our blind subjects were able to use the sound representation to construct a conscious mental image that was revealed by their ability to depict a visual target by drawing it. We noted the similarity between the way the visual system integrates information from successive fixations to form a representation that is stable across eye movements and the way a succession of image frames (encoded in sound) which depict different portions of the image are integrated to form a seamless mental image. Finally, we discuss the profound resemblance between the way a professional musician carries out a structural analysis of a musical composition in order to relate its structure to the perception of musical form and the strategies used by our blind subjects in isolating structural features that collectively reveal the identity of visual form.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2000.1273

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cronly-Dillon, Persaud and Blore (2000) found observers were able to recognize basic shapes such as buildings and cars through tonotopic representation.

    “Cronly-Dillon, Persaud and Blore (2000) trained observers to recognize sounds through tonotopic representation (Väljamäe & Kleiner, 2006) finding that observers were able to recognize basic shapes such as buildings and cars.”

    From Designing sensory-substitution devices: Principles, pitfalls and potential1 (2016) · cites this paper as Cronly-Dillon, Persaud and Blore (2000)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Cronly-Dillon, J., Persaud, K. & Gregory , R. P. F. 1999 The perception of visual images encoded in musical form: a study in cross modality information transfer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266 , 2427^2433.
  2. Desimone, R., Miller, E. K., Chelazzi, L. & Lueschow, A. 1996 Multiple memory systems in the visual cortex. In The cognitive neurosciences (ed. M. Gazzaniga) , pp. 475^486. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  3. Gregory , R. L. 1998 Eye and brain , 5th edn. Oxford University Press.
  4. Hochberg, J. 1968 In the mind's eye. In Contemporary theory and research in visual perception (ed. R. M. Haber), pp. 337^354. London: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  5. Konorski, J. 1969 Integrative action of the brain . Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
  6. Kosslyn, S. M. & Sussman, A. L. 1996 Roles of imagery in perception. In The cognitive neurosciences (ed. M. Gazzaniga) , pp. 1035^1041. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  7. Minsky, M. 1977 Frame-system theory. In Thinking: readings in cognitive science (ed. P. N. Johnson-Laird & P. C. Wason). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  8. Oliva, A., Guerin-Dugue, A. & T orralba, A. 1998 Scene classi¢cation from power spectrum shapes. Proceedings of the European Conference on Visual Perception, August 1998. Perception (Suppl. ) 27 .
  9. Tureck, R. 1996 Cell, functions, relationships in musical structure and performance. Proc. R. Inst. 67 , 277^318.
  10. Watt, R. 1995 Some speculations on the role of texture processing in visual perception. In Early vision and beyond (ed. T. V . Papathomas, C. Cubb, A. Gorea & E. Kowler), pp. 59^ 68. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cronly–Dillon, J., Persaud, K. C., & Blore, R.
Affiliations
  • Department of Optometry and Neuroscience, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, Manchester M60 1QD, UK
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
2000-11-07
Volume
267
Issue
1458
Pages
2231-2238
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2131554532
Cited by
35
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
visual scene perception, eye movements, landmark detection, route navigation, musical form analysis, cross-modal perception
MeSH terms
Blindness, Humans, Imagination, Models, Psychological, Music, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review