Confronting the winds: orientation and flight behaviour of roosting swifts,Apus apus
Open accessAbstract
Swifts, Apus apus, spend the night aloft and this offers an opportunity to test the degree of adaptability of bird orientation and flight to different ecological situations. We predicted the swifts' behaviour by assuming that they are adapted to minimize energy expenditure during the nocturnal flight and during a compensatory homing flight if they become displaced by wind. We tested the predictions by recording the swifts' altitudes, speeds and directions under different wind conditions with tracking radar; we found an agreement between predictions and observations for orientation behaviour, but not for altitude and speed regulation. The swifts orientated consistently into the head wind, with angular concentration increasing with increasing wind speed. However, contrary to our predictions, they did not select altitudes with slow or moderate winds, nor did they increase their airspeed distinctly when flying into strong head winds. A possible explanation is that their head-wind orientation is sufficient to keep nocturnal displacement from their home area within tolerable limits, leaving flight altitude to be determined by other factors (correlated with temperature), and airspeed to show only a marginal increase in strong winds. The swifts were often moving "backwards", heading straight into the wind but being overpowered by wind speeds exceeding their airspeed. The regular occurrence of such flights is probably uniquely associated with the swifts' remarkable habit of roosting on the wing.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Swift flight altitudes are selected according to temperature, with swifts flying at higher altitudes on warmer nights.
“Instead, flight altitudes are selected according to temperature, with swifts flying and Dudley (1995) and experiments with Selasphorus platycercus and S. rufus were performed by Altshuler and Dudley (2003).”
From The physiology and biomechanics of avian flight at high altitude (2006) · cites this paper as Backman and Alerstam, 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The physiology and biomechanics of avian flight at high altitude
Altshuler, D. L. (2006) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icj008 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Twenty-Three Testable Predictions About Bird Flight
Hedenström, A. (2003) · Avian Migration · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-05957-9_38 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bäckman, J., & Alerstam, T.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Bäckman, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2001-05-22
- Volume
- 268
- Issue
- 1471
- Pages
- 1081-1087
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W1984945686
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
- Keywords
- common swift, Swift, night flying, flight altitude, air velocity, energy expenditure, flight behavior, wind speed
- MeSH terms
- Altitude, Animals, Birds, Flight, Animal, Orientation, Wind
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review