Cited by 55Avian ecology and behaviorWildlife Ecology and ConservationBat Biology and Ecology Studies

Confronting the winds: orientation and flight behaviour of roosting swifts,Apus apus

Open access
Bäckman, J., Alerstam, T.·2001·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Swifts, Apus apus, spend the night aloft and this offers an opportunity to test the degree of adaptability of bird orientation and flight to different ecological situations. We predicted the swifts' behaviour by assuming that they are adapted to minimize energy expenditure during the nocturnal flight and during a compensatory homing flight if they become displaced by wind. We tested the predictions by recording the swifts' altitudes, speeds and directions under different wind conditions with tracking radar; we found an agreement between predictions and observations for orientation behaviour, but not for altitude and speed regulation. The swifts orientated consistently into the head wind, with angular concentration increasing with increasing wind speed. However, contrary to our predictions, they did not select altitudes with slow or moderate winds, nor did they increase their airspeed distinctly when flying into strong head winds. A possible explanation is that their head-wind orientation is sufficient to keep nocturnal displacement from their home area within tolerable limits, leaving flight altitude to be determined by other factors (correlated with temperature), and airspeed to show only a marginal increase in strong winds. The swifts were often moving "backwards", heading straight into the wind but being overpowered by wind speeds exceeding their airspeed. The regular occurrence of such flights is probably uniquely associated with the swifts' remarkable habit of roosting on the wing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2001.1622

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Swift flight altitudes are selected according to temperature, with swifts flying at higher altitudes on warmer nights.

    “Instead, flight altitudes are selected according to temperature, with swifts flying and Dudley (1995) and experiments with Selasphorus platycercus and S. rufus were performed by Altshuler and Dudley (2003).”

    From The physiology and biomechanics of avian flight at high altitude (2006) · cites this paper as Backman and Alerstam, 2001

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bäckman, J., & Alerstam, T.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Bäckman, J.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
2001-05-22
Volume
268
Issue
1471
Pages
1081-1087
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W1984945686
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Bat Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
common swift, Swift, night flying, flight altitude, air velocity, energy expenditure, flight behavior, wind speed
MeSH terms
Altitude, Animals, Birds, Flight, Animal, Orientation, Wind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review