The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree
Open accessAbstract
Growing evidence of morphological diversity in angiosperm flowers, seeds and pollen from the mid Cretaceous and the presence of derived lineages from increasingly older geological deposits both imply that the timing of early angiosperm cladogenesis is older than fossil-based estimates have indicated. An alternative to fossils for calibrating the phylogeny comes from divergence in DNA sequence data. Here, angiosperm divergence times are estimated using non-parametric rate smoothing and a three-gene dataset covering ca. 75% of all angiosperm families recognized in recent classifications. The results provide an initial hypothesis of angiosperm diversification times. Using an internal calibration point, an independent evaluation of angiosperm and eudicot origins is performed. The origin of the crown group of extant angiosperms is indicated to be Early to Middle Jurassic (179-158 Myr), and the origin of eudicots is resolved as Late Jurassic to mid Cretaceous (147-131 Myr). Both estimates, despite a conservative calibration point, are older than current fossil-based estimates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dating of the human–ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA.
Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H., & Yano, T.-A. (1985) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02101694 · Cited by 8,687
A nonparametric approach to estimating divergence times in the absence of rate constancy.
Sanderson, M. J. (1997) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025731 · Cited by 1,156 · cited 9×
“If any amount or any type of changes is allowed and considered, the estimates from an NPRS analysis will be associated with large errors (Sanderson 1997).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
Sanderson, M. J. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.301 · Cited by 1,906
The genome of the cucumber,Cucumis sativus L
Huang, S., Li, R., Zhang, Z., Li, L., Gu, X., Fan, W., Lucas, W. J., Wang, X., Xie, B., Ni, P., et al. (2009) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.475 · Cited by 1,490
Polyploidy and angiosperm diversification
Soltis, D. E., Albert, V. A., Leebens‐Mack, J., Bell, C. D., Paterson, A. H., Zheng, C., Sankoff, D., de Pamphilis, C. W., Wall, P. K., & Soltis, P. S. (2009) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.0800079 · Cited by 1,257
Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution
(2013) · doi:10.1515/9781400846184 · Cited by 1,183
The draft genome of the transgenic tropical fruit tree papaya (Carica papaya Linnaeus)
Ming, R., Hou, S., Feng, Y., Yu, Q., Dionne-Laporte, A., Saw, J. H., Senin, P., Wang, W., Ly, B. V., Lewis, K. L. T., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06856 · Cited by 1,084
Metadata
- Authors
- Wikström, N., Savolainen, V., & Chase, M. W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2001-11-07
- Volume
- 268
- Issue
- 1482
- Pages
- 2211-2220
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2106768037
- Cited by
- 1,506
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 39.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2001.1782
- The paper
- Wikström, N., Savolainen, V., & Chase, M. W. (2001). Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1782
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.