The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Echolocation range and wingbeat period match in aerial-hawking bats
Open accessAbstract
Aerial-hawking bats searching the sky for prey face the problem that flight and echolocation exert independent and possibly conflicting influences on call intervals. These bats can only exploit their full echolocation range unambiguously if they emit their next call when all echoes from the preceding call would have arrived. However, not every call interval is equally available. The need to reduce the high energetic costs of echolocation forces aerial-hawking bats to couple call emission to their wingbeat. We compared the wingbeat periods of 11 aerial-hawking bat species with the delays of the last-expected echoes. Acoustic flight-path tracking was employed to measure the source levels (SLs) of echolocation calls in the field. SLs were very high, extending the known range to 133 dB peak equivalent sound pressure level. We calculated the maximum detection distances for insects, larger flying objects and background targets. Wingbeat periods were derived from call intervals. Small and medium-sized bats in fact matched their maximum detection range for insects and larger flying targets to their wingbeat period. The tendency to skip calls correlated with the species' detection range for background targets. We argue that a species' call frequency is at such a pitch that the resulting detection range matches their wingbeat period.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pennycuick, C. J. (1975) · Avian Biology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-249405-5.50009-4 · Cited by 1,072
Cited by
The evolution of echolocation in bats
JONES, G., & TEELING, E. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.01.001 · Cited by 470
Sensory acquisition in active sensing systems
Nelson, M. E., & MacIver, M. A. (2006) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/s00359-006-0099-4 · Cited by 247
Omnidirectional sensory and motor volumes in electric fish
Snyder, J. B., Nelson, M. E., Burdick, J. W., & MacIver, M. A. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050301 · Cited by 112
Luo, J., Koselj, K., Zsebők, S., Siemers, B. M., & Goerlitz, H. R. (2014) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2013.0961 · Cited by 75
Thaler, L., Zhang, X., Antoniou, M., Kish, D. C., & Cowie, D. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/xhp0000697 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Holderied, M. W., & von Helversen, O.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2003-11-07
- Volume
- 270
- Issue
- 1530
- Pages
- 2293-2299
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2023149149
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Echolocation range and wingbeat period match in aerial-hawking bats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2003.2487
- The paper
- Holderied, M. W., & von Helversen, O. (2003). Echolocation range and wingbeat period match in aerial-hawking bats. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2487
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.