The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diversity and population structure of a near–shore marine–sediment viral community
Open accessAbstract
Viruses, most of which are phage, are extremely abundant in marine sediments, yet almost nothing is known about their identity or diversity. We present the metagenomic analysis of an uncultured near-shore marine-sediment viral community. Three-quarters of the sequences in the sample were not related to anything previously reported. Among the sequences that could be identified, the majority belonged to double-stranded DNA phage. Temperate phage were more common than lytic phage, suggesting that lysogeny may be an important lifestyle for sediment viruses. Comparisons between the sediment sample and previously sequenced seawater viral communities showed that certain phage phylogenetic groups were abundant in all marine viral communities, while other phage groups were under-represented or absent. This 'marineness' suggests that marine phage are derived from a common set of ancestors. Several independent mathematical models, based on the distribution of overlapping shotgun sequence fragments from the library, were used to show that the diversity of the viral community was extremely high, with at least 10(4) viral genotypes per kilogram of sediment and a Shannon index greater than 9 nats. Based on these observations we propose that marine-sediment viral communities are one of the largest unexplored reservoirs of sequence space on the planet.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prokaryotes: The unseen majority
Whitman, W. B., Coleman, D. C., & Wiebe, W. J. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.12.6578 · Cited by 4,871
Cited by
UniFrac – An online tool for comparing microbial community diversity in a phylogenetic context
Lozupone, C., Hamady, M., & Knight, R. (2006) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-371 · Cited by 1,453
Here a virus, there a virus, everywhere the same virus?
Breitbart, M., & Rohwer, F. (2005) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2005.04.003 · Cited by 854
Self-citationEdwards, R. A., & Rohwer, F. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1163 · Cited by 820
Self-citationBioinformatics for Whole-Genome Shotgun Sequencing of Microbial Communities
Chen, K., & Pachter, L. (2005) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010024 · Cited by 391
Advanced sequencing technologies and their wider impact in microbiology
Hall, N. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.001370 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Breitbart, M., Felts, B., Kelley, S., Mahaffy, J. M., Nulton, J., Salamon, P., & Rohwer, F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2004-03-22
- Volume
- 271
- Issue
- 1539
- Pages
- 565-574
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2127730569
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diversity and population structure of a near–shore marine–sediment viral community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2003.2628
- The paper
- Breitbart, M., Felts, B., Kelley, S., Mahaffy, J. M., Nulton, J., Salamon, P., & Rohwer, F. (2004). Diversity and population structure of a near–shore marine–sediment viral community. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2628
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.