The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pancrustacean phylogeny: hexapods are terrestrial crustaceans and maxillopods are not monophyletic
Open accessAbstract
Recent molecular analyses indicate that crustaceans and hexapods form a clade (Pancrustacea or Tetraconata), but relationships among its constituent lineages, including monophyly of crustaceans, are controversial. Our phylogenetic analysis of three protein–coding nuclear genes from 62 arthropods and lobopods (Onychophora and Tardigrada) demonstrates that Hexapoda is most closely related to the crustaceans Branchiopoda (fairy shrimp, water fleas, etc.) and Cephalocarida + Remipedia, thereby making hexapods terrestrial crustaceans and the traditionally defined Crustacea paraphyletic. Additional findings are that Malacostraca (crabs, isopods, etc.) unites with Cirripedia (barnacles, etc.) and they, in turn, with Copepoda, making the traditional crustacean class Maxillopoda paraphyletic. Ostracoda (seed shrimp)—either all or a subgroup—is associated with Branchiura (fish lice) and likely to be basal to all other pancrustaceans. A Bayesian statistical (non–clock) estimate of divergence times suggests a Precambrian origin for Pancrustacea (600 Myr ago or more), which precedes the first unambiguous arthropod fossils by over 60 Myr.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Divergence time and evolutionary rate estimation with multilocus data.
Thorne, J. L., & Kishino, H. (2002) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150290102456 · Cited by 962
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Abele L. G., 1989, Molecular evidence for inclusion of the phylum Pentastomida in the, Crustacea. Mol. Biol. Evol., 6, 685
- 10.1038/385627a0 · DOI · Paper page
- Benton M. J. (ed.) 1993 The fossil record 2. London: Chapman & Hall.
- 10.1038/33577 · DOI
- Dohle W., 2001, Are the insects terrestrial crustaceans? A discussion of some new facts and arguments and the proposal of the proper name `Tetraconata' for the monophyletic unit Crustacea þ Hexapoda, Annls Soc. Entomol. Fr., 37, 85
- 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2000.tb00352.x · DOI
- 10.1080/10635150390235485 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/376165a0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/35093097 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026342 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/35093090 · DOI · Paper page
- Jones D. T., 1992, The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences, Comp. Appl. Biosci., 8, 275
- Kraus O., 2001, Myriapoda' and the ancestry of the Hexapoda, Annls Soc. Entomol. Fr., 37, 105
- 10.1098/rspb.2003.2631 · DOI
- 10.1078/0044-5231-00053 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ympev.2003.07.013 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/35054550 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00239-003-2563-x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.032483599 · DOI
- 10.1186/1741-7007-2-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/icb/38.6.918 · DOI
- 10.1006/mpev.2001.0956 · DOI
- 10.1603/0013-8746(2004)097[0411:POBHLA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744-7410.2004.tb00145.x · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.41.1.61 · DOI
- Schram F. 1986 Crustacea. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Spears T. & Abele L. G. 1998 Crustacean phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA. In Arthropod relationships (ed. R. A. Fortey & R. H. Thomas) pp. 169-187. London: Chapman & Hall. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.asd.2003.09.004 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0263593300006295 · DOI
- 10.2307/1547965 · DOI
- Zrzavy J. Hypsa V. & Vlásková M. 1998 Arthropod phylogeny: taxonomic congruence total evidence and conditional combination approaches to morphological and molecular data sets. In Arthropod relationships (ed. R. A. Fortey & R. H. Thomas) pp. 97-107. London: Chapman & Hall. · DOI
Cited by
Peterson, K. J., Cotton, J. A., Gehling, J. G., & Pisani, D. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2233 · Cited by 313
Gliding and the Functional Origins of Flight: Biomechanical Novelty or Necessity?
Dudley, R., Byrnes, G., Yanoviak, S. P., Borrell, B., Brown, R. M., & McGuire, J. A. (2007) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110014 · Cited by 192
Serine Codon-Usage Bias in Deep Phylogenomics: Pancrustacean Relationships as a Case Study
Rota-Stabelli, O., Lartillot, N., Philippe, H., & Pisani, D. (2013) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys077 · Cited by 155
Dating the arthropod tree based on large-scale transcriptome data
Rehm, P., Borner, J., Meusemann, K., von Reumont, B. M., Simon, S., Hadrys, H., Misof, B., & Burmester, T. (2011) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2011.09.003 · Cited by 121
The mouth, the anus, and the blastopore—open questions about questionable openings
Hejnol, A., & Martindale, M. Q. (2009) · Animal Evolution · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199549429.003.0004 · Cited by 37
Genomic, phylogenetic, and cell biological insights into metazoan origins
Nichols, S. A., Dayel, M. J., & King, N. (2009) · Animal Evolution · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199549429.003.0003 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Regier, J. C., Shultz, J. W., & Kambic, R. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2005-02-21
- Volume
- 272
- Issue
- 1561
- Pages
- 395-401
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2076320557
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
