Cited by 165Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyMorphological variations and asymmetryForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

The craniomandibular mechanics of being human

Open access
Wroe, Stephen, Ferrara, Toni L., McHenry, Colin R., Curnoe, Darren, Chamoli, Uphar·2010·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Diminished bite force has been considered a defining feature of modern Homo sapiens, an interpretation inferred from the application of two-dimensional lever mechanics and the relative gracility of the human masticatory musculature and skull. This conclusion has various implications with regard to the evolution of human feeding behaviour. However, human dental anatomy suggests a capacity to withstand high loads and two-dimensional lever models greatly simplify muscle architecture, yielding less accurate results than three-dimensional modelling using multiple lines of action. Here, to our knowledge, in the most comprehensive three-dimensional finite element analysis performed to date for any taxon, we ask whether the traditional view that the bite of H. sapiens is weak and the skull too gracile to sustain high bite forces is supported. We further introduce a new method for reconstructing incomplete fossil material. Our findings show that the human masticatory apparatus is highly efficient, capable of producing a relatively powerful bite using low muscle forces. Thus, relative to other members of the superfamily Hominoidea, humans can achieve relatively high bite forces, while overall stresses are reduced. Our findings resolve apparently discordant lines of evidence, i.e. the presence of teeth well adapted to sustain high loads within a lightweight cranium and mandible.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2010.0509

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • H. sapiens facial skeletons show increased bite force relative to Middle Pleistocene hominins, which could be an advantage in fracturing hard objects.

    “it has been argued 71 that H. sapiens facial skeletons show increased bite force relative to MP hominins 72,73 , which could be an advantage in fracturing hard objects”

    From The evolutionary history of the human face (2019) · cites this paper as [71]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 165

Authors
Wroe, S., Ferrara, T. L., McHenry, C. R., Curnoe, D., & Chamoli, U.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Wroe, Stephen
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2010-06-23
Volume
277
Issue
1700
Pages
3579-3586
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2113309116
Cited by
165
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 9
FWCI
52.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EPubDev Repository (submittedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of New South Wales (DP0987985)
  • Australian Research Council (DP0666374, DP0986471)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Keywords
bite force, human, stomatognathic system, three-dimensional finite element analysis, masticatory muscles, fossil reconstruction, apes, masticatory efficiency
MeSH terms
Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Bite Force, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Humans, Mandible, Masticatory Muscles, Models, Biological, Skull, Stress, Mechanical, Hominidae, Finite Element Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review