The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural processing of imminent collision in humans
Open accessAbstract
Detecting a looming object and its imminent collision is imperative to survival. For most humans, it is a fundamental aspect of daily activities such as driving, road crossing and participating in sport, yet little is known about how the brain both detects and responds to such stimuli. Here we use functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess neural response to looming stimuli in comparison with receding stimuli and motion-controlled static stimuli. We demonstrate for the first time that, in the human, the superior colliculus and the pulvinar nucleus of the thalamus respond to looming in addition to cortical regions associated with motor preparation. We also implicate the anterior insula in making timing computations for collision events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In line with these findings, preferential activation in response to looming stimuli has been observed in the pulvinar, and putatively located in the medial pulvinar (Billington et al. 2011; Huang et al. 2018).”
From Neuroanatomical correlates of peripersonal space: bridging the gap between perception, action, emotion and social cognition (2024) · cites this paper as Billington et al. 2011
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In line with this role, SC also has been shown to respond to looming visual stimuli, which have to be recognized as immediately salient for the individual (Billington et al. 2011; Vieira et al. 2020).”
From Neuroanatomical correlates of peripersonal space: bridging the gap between perception, action, emotion and social cognition (2024) · cites this paper as Billington et al. 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How do you feel — now? The anterior insula and human awareness
(Bud) Craig, A. D. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2555 · Cited by 6,657 · cited 1×
“…in making duration judgments (Livesey et al., 2007), error detection (Klein et al., 2007) and interoceptive awareness on a variety of tasks (Craig, 2009). y Our current findings, taken together this research suggests that this cortical region may be particularly attuned to making timing…”
A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision
Lee, D. N. (1976) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p050437 · Cited by 2,094
Jeurgen, K., Assheuer, J., & Paxinos, G. (1997) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,403
The basal ganglia: a vertebrate solution to the selection problem?
Redgrave, P., Prescott, T. J., & Gurney, K. (1999) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00319-4 · Cited by 1,199
VISUALLY CONTROLLED LOCOMOTION AND VISUAL ORIENTATION IN ANIMALS*
Gibson, J. J. (1958) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1958.tb00656.x · Cited by 825
Human parietal cortex in action
Culham, J. C., & Valyear, K. F. (2006) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2006.03.005 · Cited by 654
Comparative Neurology of the Optic Tectum
(1984) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-5376-6 · Cited by 478
Persistent Fear Responses in Rhesus Monkeys to the Optical Stimulus of "Looming"
Schiff, W., Caviness, J. A., & Gibson, J. J. (1962) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.136.3520.982 · Cited by 404
Computation of different optical variables of looming objects in pigeon nucleus rotundus neurons
Sun, H., & Frost, B. J. (1998) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/1110 · Cited by 394
Neural correlates of error awareness
Klein, T. A., Endraß, T., Kathmann, N., Neumann, J., von Cramon, D. Y., & Ullsperger, M. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.014 · Cited by 387
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neural circuits underlying visually evoked escapes in larval zebrafish
Dunn, T. W., Gebhardt, C., Naumann, E. A., Riegler, C., Ahrens, M. B., Engert, F., & Del Bene, F. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.12.021 · Cited by 347
Divergent midbrain circuits orchestrate escape and freezing responses to looming stimuli in mice
Shang, C., Chen, Z., Liu, A., Li, Y., Zhang, J., Qu, B., Yan, F., Zhang, Y., Liu, W., Liu, Z., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03580-7 · Cited by 270
Comoli, E., Favaro, P. D., Vautrelle, N., Leriche, M., Overton, P. G., & Redgrave, P. (2012) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2012.00009 · Cited by 175
“Potentially harmful looming stimuli activate the SC in a range of species (Westby et al., 1990; Liu et al., 2011) including humans (Billington et al., 2011), while stimulation of the SC can evoke defensive reactions extending from immediate arrest and freezing to violent defense-like locomotor…”
BackgroundFrom affective blindsight to emotional consciousness
Celeghin, A., de Gelder, B., & Tamietto, M. (2015) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2015.05.007 · Cited by 137
The Neural Basis of Escape Behavior in Vertebrates
Branco, T., & Redgrave, P. (2020) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-100219-122527 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Billington, J., Wilkie, R. M., Field, D. T., & Wann, J. P.
- Affiliations
- Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
- University of Leeds (GB)
- University of Reading (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Wann, John P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2010-10-27
- Volume
- 278
- Issue
- 1711
- Pages
- 1476-1481
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- PMC
- PMC3081747
- OpenAlex
- W2095956597
- Cited by
- 111
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 3.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CentAUR (University of Reading) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/D055342/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- looming stimuli, collision detection, superior colliculus, pulvinar, thalamus, anterior insula, motor preparation, collision timing, threat detection, visual motion perception
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motion Perception, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Superior Colliculi, Pulvinar
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
