The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Linking genes to communities and ecosystems: Daphnia as an ecogenomic model
Open accessAbstract
How do genetic variation and evolutionary change in critical species affect the composition and functioning of populations, communities and ecosystems? Illuminating the links in the causal chain from genes up to ecosystems is a particularly exciting prospect now that the feedbacks between ecological and evolutionary changes are known to be bidirectional. Yet to fully explore phenomena that span multiple levels of the biological hierarchy requires model organisms and systems that feature a comprehensive triad of strong ecological interactions in nature, experimental tractability in diverse contexts and accessibility to modern genomic tools. The water flea Daphnia satisfies these criteria, and genomic approaches capitalizing on the pivotal role Daphnia plays in the functioning of pelagic freshwater food webs will enable investigations of eco-evolutionary dynamics in unprecedented detail. Because its ecology is profoundly influenced by both genetic polymorphism and phenotypic plasticity, Daphnia represents a model system with tremendous potential for developing a mechanistic understanding of the relationship between traits at the genetic, organismal and population levels, and consequences for community and ecosystem dynamics. Here, we highlight the combination of traits and ecological interactions that make Daphnia a definitive model system, focusing on the additional power and capabilities enabled by recent molecular and genomic advances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs
Elser, J. J., Fagan, W. F., Denno, R. F., Dobberfuhl, D. R., Folarin, A., Huberty, A., Interlandi, S., Kilham, S. S., McCauley, E., Schulz, K. L., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35046058 · Cited by 1,645
Hairston, N. G., Kearns, C. M., Perry Demma, L., & Effler, S. W. (2005) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/03-0784 · Cited by 34
Self-citation
Cited by
Di Poi, C., Costil, K., Bouchart, V., & Halm-Lemeille, M.-P. (2018) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-017-9306-9 · Cited by 133
Boyd, A., Stewart, C. B., Philibert, D. A., How, Z. T., El-Din, M. G., Tierney, K. B., & Blewett, T. A. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141707 · Cited by 69
Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Qin, S., Yang, Z., & Sun, Y. (2023) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120657 · Cited by 24
Gigl, F., Abdullahi, M., Barnard, M., Hollert, H., & Orsini, L. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174963 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Miner, B. E., De Meester, L., Pfrender, M. E., Lampert, W., & Hairston, N. G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 279
- Issue
- 1735
- Pages
- 1873-1882
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2125924849
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Linking genes to communities and ecosystems: Daphnia as an ecogenomic model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2011.2404
- The paper
- Miner, B. E., De Meester, L., Pfrender, M. E., Lampert, W., & Hairston, N. G. (2012). Linking genes to communities and ecosystems: Daphnia as an ecogenomic model. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.2404
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.