Context sensitivity in action decreases along the autism spectrum: a predictive processing perspective
Open accessAbstract
Recent predictive processing accounts of perception and action point towards a key challenge for the nervous system in dynamically optimizing the balance between incoming sensory information and existing expectations regarding the state of the environment. Here, we report differences in the influence of the preceding sensory context on motor function, varying with respect to both clinical and subclinical features of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Reach-to-grasp movements were recorded subsequent to an inactive period in which illusory ownership of a prosthetic limb was induced. We analysed the sub-components of reach trajectories derived using a minimum-jerk fitting procedure. Non-clinical adults low in autistic features showed disrupted movement execution following the illusion compared to a control condition. By contrast, individuals higher in autistic features (both those with ASD and non-clinical individuals high in autistic traits) showed reduced sensitivity to the presence of the illusion in their reaching movements while still exhibiting the typical perceptual effects of the illusion. Clinical individuals were distinct from non-clinical individuals scoring high in autistic features, however, in the early stages of movement. These results suggest that the influence of high-level representations of the environment differs between individuals, contributing to clinical and subclinical differences in motor performance that manifest in a contextual manner. As high-level representations of context help to explain fluctuations in sensory input over relatively longer time scales, more circumscribed sensitivity to prior or contextual information in autistic sensory processing could contribute more generally to reduced social comprehension, sensory impairments and a stronger desire for predictability and routine.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These results align with previous observations that sensorimotor processing is insensitive to varying levels of environmental uncertainty in autism.
“These results align with previous observations that sensorimotor processing is insensitive to varying levels of environmental uncertainty in autism [32,42,79].”
From Testing predictive coding theories of autism spectrum disorder using models of active inference (2023) · cites this paper as [79]
The Discussion (page not provided) reports reduced sensitivity to an uncertain, illusion-induced context in the reaching movements of people with ASD and people high in autistic traits. It also reports context-dependent differences, so it does not establish that sensorimotor processing in autism is generally insensitive to varying levels of environmental uncertainty. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredA psychophysical study by Palmer et al. showed that adults with ASD exhibited the typical perceptual effects of the rubber hand illusion but showed reduced influence of the illusion on subsequent grasp movements.
“For example, a psychophysical study by Palmer et al. (100) showed that adults with ASD exhibited the typical perceptual effects of the rubber hand illusion but showed reduced influence of the illusion on subsequent grasp movements.”
From Can Bayesian Theories of Autism Spectrum Disorder Help Improve Clinical Practice? (2016) · cites this paper as [100]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 82
- Authors
- Palmer, C. J., Paton, B., Kirkovski, M., Enticott, P. G., & Hohwy, J.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Deakin University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Palmer, Colin J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2015-03-07
- Volume
- 282
- Issue
- 1802
- Pages
- 20141557
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- PMC
- PMC4344134
- OpenAlex
- W1996319427
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 17.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
- Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, predictive processing, context sensitivity, reach-to-grasp, minimum jerk trajectory, motor control, sensory context, autistic traits, movement execution
- MeSH terms
- Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adult, Female, Hand, Humans, Illusions, Male, Movement, Psychomotor Performance, Hand Strength, Somatosensory Disorders, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review