Cited by 65Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesSustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Soil management shapes ecosystem service provision and trade-offs in agricultural landscapes

Open access
Tamburini, Giovanni, De Simone, Serena, Sigura, Maurizia, Boscutti, Francesco, Marini, Lorenzo·2016·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Agroecosystems are principally managed to maximize food provisioning even if they receive a large array of supporting and regulating ecosystem services (ESs). Hence, comprehensive studies investigating the effects of local management and landscape composition on the provision of and trade-offs between multiple ESs are urgently needed. We explored the effects of conservation tillage, nitrogen fertilization and landscape composition on six ESs (crop production, disease control, soil fertility, water quality regulation, weed and pest control) in winter cereals. Conservation tillage enhanced soil fertility and pest control, decreased water quality regulation and weed control, without affecting crop production and disease control. Fertilization only influenced crop production by increasing grain yield. Landscape intensification reduced the provision of disease and pest control. We also found tillage and landscape composition to interactively affect water quality regulation and weed control. Under N fertilization, conventional tillage resulted in more trade-offs between ESs than conservation tillage. Our results demonstrate that soil management and landscape composition affect the provision of several ESs and that soil management potentially shapes the trade-offs between them.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2016.1369

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • We only found 111 effect size combinations from 23 meta-analyses in which responses to diversification of crop yield and at least one other service were analyzed simultaneously.

    “We only found 111 effect size combinations, highlighting that effects of diversification on multiple ecosystem services is a major research gap (16).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 65

Authors
Tamburini, G., De Simone, S., Sigura, M., Boscutti, F., & Marini, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science, University of Udine, via delle Scienze 206, 33100, Udine, Italy
  • University of Udine (IT)
Corresponding author
Tamburini, Giovanni
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2016-08-31
Volume
283
Issue
1837
Pages
20161369
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2510389387
Cited by
65
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (University of Udine) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Seventh Framework Programme (311781)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
ecosystem services, ecosystem service trade-offs, soil management, conservation tillage, conventional tillage, nitrogen fertilization, landscape composition, winter cereals, pest control, weed control, disease control, soil fertility, water quality regulation, crop production, agroecosystems
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Conservation of Natural Resources, Soil, Ecosystem, Crops, Agricultural, Weed Control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review