A new strategy for assessing sensitivities in biochemical models
Open accessAbstract
An integral part of any systems biology approach is the modelling and simulation of the respective system under investigation. However, the values of many parameters of the system have often not been determined or are not identifiable due to technical experimental difficulties or other constraints. Sensitivity analysis is often employed to quantify the importance of each of the model's parameters in the behaviour of the system. This approach can also be useful in identifying those parts of the system that are most sensitive with the potential of becoming drug targets. A problem of the commonly used methods of sensitivity analysis is that they constitute local methods meaning that they depend directly on the exact parameter space, which in turn is not known exactly. One way to circumvent this problem is to carry out sensitivity analysis over a wide range of values for all parameters, but this is handicapped by expensive computations when the systems are high dimensional. Another approach is to employ global sensitivity analysis, which in this context is mostly based on random sampling methods. In this paper we present an efficient approach that involves using numerical optimizing methods that search a wide region of parameter space for a given model to determine the maximum and minimum values of its metabolic control coefficients. A relevant example for drug development is presented to demonstrate the strategy using the software COPASI.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sensitivity analysis has become instrumental in the systems pharmacology arena to guide the understanding and development of a complex model.
“it has become instrumental in the systems pharmacology arena to guide the understanding and development of a complex model.25, 26, 27”
From Sobol Sensitivity Analysis: A Tool to Guide the Development and Evaluation of Systems Pharmacology Models (2015) · cites this paper as [26]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 25 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Sahle, S., Mendes, P., Hoops, S., & Kummer, U.
- Affiliations
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kummer, Ursula
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2008-07-16
- Volume
- 366
- Issue
- 1880
- Pages
- 3619-3631
- ISSN
- 1364-503X (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2962
- PMC
- PMC3268210
- OpenAlex
- W2099640019
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM080219, GM080219)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation Systems
- Keywords
- sensitivity analysis, global sensitivity analysis, biochemical models, parameter identifiability, parameter space exploration, drug target identification, COPASI, systems biology
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Animals, Biochemistry, Computers, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Glycolysis, Humans, Models, Genetic, Models, Theoretical, Software, Drug Design, Reproducibility of Results, Muscle, Skeletal, Systems Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review