Cited by 44Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionModeling and Simulation Systems

A new strategy for assessing sensitivities in biochemical models

Open access
Sahle, Sven, Mendes, Pedro, Hoops, Stefan, Kummer, Ursula·2008·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Abstract

An integral part of any systems biology approach is the modelling and simulation of the respective system under investigation. However, the values of many parameters of the system have often not been determined or are not identifiable due to technical experimental difficulties or other constraints. Sensitivity analysis is often employed to quantify the importance of each of the model's parameters in the behaviour of the system. This approach can also be useful in identifying those parts of the system that are most sensitive with the potential of becoming drug targets. A problem of the commonly used methods of sensitivity analysis is that they constitute local methods meaning that they depend directly on the exact parameter space, which in turn is not known exactly. One way to circumvent this problem is to carry out sensitivity analysis over a wide range of values for all parameters, but this is handicapped by expensive computations when the systems are high dimensional. Another approach is to employ global sensitivity analysis, which in this context is mostly based on random sampling methods. In this paper we present an efficient approach that involves using numerical optimizing methods that search a wide region of parameter space for a given model to determine the maximum and minimum values of its metabolic control coefficients. A relevant example for drug development is presented to demonstrate the strategy using the software COPASI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsta.2008.0108

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 25 · Cited by 44

Authors
Sahle, S., Mendes, P., Hoops, S., & Kummer, U.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Kummer, Ursula
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2008-07-16
Volume
366
Issue
1880
Pages
3619-3631
ISSN
  • 1364-503X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2962
OpenAlex
W2099640019
Cited by
44
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM080219, GM080219)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation Systems
Keywords
sensitivity analysis, global sensitivity analysis, biochemical models, parameter identifiability, parameter space exploration, drug target identification, COPASI, systems biology
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Animals, Biochemistry, Computers, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Glycolysis, Humans, Models, Genetic, Models, Theoretical, Software, Drug Design, Reproducibility of Results, Muscle, Skeletal, Systems Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review