The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Transdimensional inference in the geosciences
Abstract
Seismologists construct images of the Earth's interior structure using observations, derived from seismograms, collected at the surface. A common approach to such inverse problems is to build a single 'best' Earth model, in some sense. This is despite the fact that the observations by themselves often do not require, or even allow, a single best-fit Earth model to exist. Interpretation of optimal models can be fraught with difficulties, particularly when formal uncertainty estimates become heavily dependent on the regularization imposed. Similar issues occur across the physical sciences with model construction in ill-posed problems. An alternative approach is to embrace the non-uniqueness directly and employ an inference process based on parameter space sampling. Instead of seeking a best model within an optimization framework, one seeks an ensemble of solutions and derives properties of that ensemble for inspection. While this idea has itself been employed for more than 30 years, it is now receiving increasing attention in the geosciences. Recently, it has been shown that transdimensional and hierarchical sampling methods have some considerable benefits for problems involving multiple parameter types, uncertain data errors and/or uncertain model parametrizations, as are common in seismology. Rather than being forced to make decisions on parametrization, the level of data noise and the weights between data types in advance, as is often the case in an optimization framework, t…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- 10.1029/2001GC000213 · DOI
- 10.1029/2003JB002652 · DOI
- Okabe A, 1992, Spatial tessellations: concepts and applications of Voronoi diagrams
- 10.1016/S0065-2687(03)46002-0 · DOI
- 10.1190/1.3073002 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03409.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.10.020 · DOI
- Mackay DJC, 2003, Information theory, inference, and learning algorithms
- Denison DGT, 2002, Bayesian methods for nonlinear classification and regression
- 10.1190/1.6241045.1 · DOI
- McGrayne SB, 1987, The theory that would not die: how Bayes' rule cracked the enigma code, hunted down Russian submarines, and emerged triumphant from two centuries of controversy
- 10.1098/rstl.1763.0053 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03155.x · DOI
- Gilks W, 1996, Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice
- 10.1093/biomet/82.4.711 · DOI
- Geyer CJ, 1994, Simulation procedures and likelihood inference for spatial point processes, Scand. J. Stat., 21, 359
- 10.1046/j.1365-246X.2002.01847.x · DOI
- 10.1190/1.1778243 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.11.027 · DOI
- 10.1029/2011JB008825 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2117.2008.00369.x · DOI
- Reading AM, 2010, In Conf. Handbook: 21st Int. Geophysical Conf. & Exhibition, Future Discoveries are in our Hands, Sydney, Australia, 22–24 August 2010, 1
- 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03596.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04192.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s11004-005-9109-3 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00496.x · DOI
- 10.1088/0266-5611/25/5/055009 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04226.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05414.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04530.x · DOI
- 10.1029/2011JB008560 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1121/1.3500674 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05165.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05302.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2009.01.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.09.015 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9868.03711 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.spl.2004.06.025 · DOI
- 10.1190/1.1444928 · DOI
- Aster R, 2005, Parameter estimation and inverse problems
- 10.1029/JB095iB10p15303 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1990.tb04588.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tkalčić, H. (2024) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2023gl107043 · Cited by 4
“We employ the Bayesian transdimensional inversion approach (Bodin et al., 2012; Sambridge et al., 2013; Tkalčić, Young, et al., 2013).”
MethodSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sambridge, M., Bodin, T., Gallagher, K., & Tkalčić, H.
- Affiliations
- Australian National University (AU)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Géosciences Rennes (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Sambridge, M.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2013-02-13
- Volume
- 371
- Issue
- 1984
- Pages
- 20110547
- ISSN
- 1364-503X (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2962
- OpenAlex
- W1971072157
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7
- FWCI
- 16.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Seismic Waves and Analysis
- Keywords
- hierarchical sampling, seismic inversion, Earth's interior, ill-posed problems, non-uniqueness, parameter space sampling, model uncertainty, regularization, noisy data, model parameterization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review