Cited by 59Environmental Impact and SustainabilityBioeconomy and Sustainability DevelopmentChemistry and Chemical Engineering

Life cycle assessment (LCA): informing the development of a sustainable circular bioeconomy?

Open access
Sevigné-Itoiz, Eva, Mwabonje, Onesmus, Panoutsou, Calliope, Woods, Jeremy·2021·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences

Abstract

The role of life cycle assessment (LCA) in informing the development of a sustainable and circular bioeconomy is discussed. We analyse the critical challenges remaining in using LCA and propose improvements needed to resolve future development challenges. Biobased systems are often complex combinations of technologies and practices that are geographically dispersed over long distances and with heterogeneous and uncertain sets of indicators and impacts. Recent studies have provided methodological suggestions on how LCA can be improved for evaluating the sustainability of biobased systems with a new focus on emerging systems, helping to identify environmental and social opportunities prior to large R&D investments. However, accessing economies of scale and improved conversion efficiencies while maintaining compatibility across broad ranges of sustainability indicators and public acceptability remain key challenges for the bioeconomy. LCA can inform, but not by itself resolve this complex dimension of sustainability. Future policy interventions that aim to promote the bioeconomy and support strategic value chains will benefit from the systematic use of LCA. However, the LCA community needs to develop the mechanisms and tools needed to generate agreement and coordinate the standards and incentives that will underpin a successful biobased transition. Systematic stakeholder engagement and the use of multidisciplinary analysis in combination with LCA are essential components of emergent LCA methods. This article is part of the theme issue 'Bio-derived and bioinspired sustainable advanced materials for emerging technologies (part 1)'.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsta.2020.0352

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unexpected events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, may delay the trend in a context of low technological development and economic crisis, hindering the penetration of emerging technology in the market.

    “The occurrence of unexpected events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, may definitely delay the trend in a context of low technological development and economic crisis, hindering the pene­ tration of emerging technology in the market [11,119].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 75 · Cited by 59

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [10]Panoutsou C. 2017 Modeling and optimization of biomass supply chains. in: top-down and bottom-up assessment for agricultural, forest and waste feedstock, pp. 1–24. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Academic Press. (10.1016/C2916-0-03577-5) · DOI
  2. [69]Colantonio A, Lane G. 2007 Measuring social sustainability: best practice from urban renewal in the EU, 2007/01: EIBURS working paper series. Oxford, UK: Oxford Institute for Sustainable Development (OISD)–International Land Markets Group.

Authors
Sevigné-Itoiz, E., Mwabonje, O., Panoutsou, C., & Woods, J.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Environmental Policy (CEP), Imperial College London, (ICL), 18-19 Princess Garden, South Kensington, London SW7 1NE, UK
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2021-08-02
Volume
379
Issue
2206
Pages
20200352-20200352
ISSN
  • 1364-503X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2962
OpenAlex
W3173822973
Cited by
59
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 2
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/R021740/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Keywords
life cycle assessment, circular bioeconomy, sustainability assessment, economies of scale, conversion efficiency, sustainability indicators, stakeholder engagement, bioeconomy policy
MeSH terms
Animals, Life Cycle Stages, Policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review