The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The gyroscopic mechanism of the halteres of Diptera
Abstract
The paper gives a detailed anatomical, dynamical and physiological analysis of the gyroscopic mechanism of the halteres of the higher Diptera. (1) A re-examination has been made of the structure of the articular region of the halteres of Lucilia sericata, Calliphora erythrocephala and Eristalis tenax. In these higher Diptera the organ as a whole is free to move only in one plane, by oscillation through an angle of approximately 150° about a horizontal hinge. A secondary articulation distal to the main hinge allows a slight, damped movement about an axis at right angles to the hinge in the plane of oscillation. (2) The frequency of oscillation is determined by the mechanical resonance of the system. The single muscle produces, by its contraction, an upwards movement of the haltere and the downstroke results from the elasticity of the hinge. (3) Stroboscopic observation of the haltere in the living fly shows that the cycle of oscillation consists of two phases of nearly constant angular velocity with rapid reversals at the ends of the stroke. (4) Dynamical analysis of such a mechanical system shows that: (a) when the fly as a whole is not rotating, the secondary articulation ensures that the only forces acting on the basal region of the haltere are the ‘primary’ torques about the main hinge, (b) When the fly is rotating in any plane not that of the oscillation, gyroscopic torques are set up at the base of the haltere about an axis at right-angles to the haltere in the plane of oscillation, (c) The magnitude and periodicity of these torques are different for yawing rotations and for pitch or roll. (5) Since pitching and rolling rotations can be distinguished only by a phase comparison between the gyroscopic torques in the halteres of opposite sides, and since it can be shown experimentally that flight is unimpaired under conditions when the two halteres are oscillating at different frequencies, it is evidently only in the yawing plane that unique indications are given to the fly by the haltere sense organs. (6) A detailed re-examination of the structure of the sensilla groups on the haltere base in the light of recent advances in knowledge of the function of campaniform and chordotonal sensilla suggests a functional classification into three classes: (A) those sensitive to the vertical ‘primary’ forces (scapal plates, Hicks papillae and small chordotonal organ), (B) those sensitive to the lateral gyroscopic forces (basal plate, large chordotonal organ) and (C) those without selective sensitivity (undifferentiated papilla). (7) A method is described of obtaining oscillograph records of impulses in the haltere nerve while the haltere is being oscillated by the pull of its own muscle. (8) When there is no rotation of the body of the fly, the volleys of impulses recorded in the haltere nerve are of the type to be expected if the sensilla groups are being excited by the ‘primary’ forces. (9) When the body of the fly is rotated in yaw or roll the pattern of impulses in the haltere nerve changes in the manner which is to be expected if certain sensilla groups are being excited by the gyroscopic forces. (10) Detailed analysis of the waveform of the oscillograph records at the beginning and end of yawing and rolling rotations reveals differences between the two types of impulse pattern which are consistent with the dynamical analysis. (11) Flash photographs of a haltere-less fly in free flight confirm that such an insect is in that state of spiral instability which is to be expected if there is inadequate stabilization in the yawing plane. (12) A brief comparison of the distribution of sensilla on the bases of the halteres and wings, and a review of what is known of the nature and periodicity of the forces acting on the base of the wings during flight, suggest that it may be possible to trace the stages through which the gyroscopic mechanism of the haltere has evolved from the flight mechanism of the wing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The function of dipteran flight muscle
Dickinson, M. H., & Tu, M. S. (1997) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Physiology · doi:10.1016/s0300-9629(96)00162-4 · Cited by 281
Strausfeld, N. J., & Seyan, H. S. (1985) · Cell and Tissue Research · doi:10.1007/bf00216350 · Cited by 276
Review of the Order Strepsiptera
KATHIRITHAMBY, J. (1989) · Systematic Entomology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3113.1989.tb00265.x · Cited by 209
Fayyazuddin, A., & Dickinson, M. H. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-16-05225.1996 · Cited by 173
Mechanics of the thorax in flies
Deora, T., Gundiah, N., & Sane, S. P. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.128363 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Pringle, J. W. S.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1948-11-02
- Volume
- 233
- Issue
- 602
- Pages
- 347-384
- ISSN
- 0080-4622 (ISSN-L)
- 2054-0280
- OpenAlex
- W2066164719
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The gyroscopic mechanism of the halteres of Diptera. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.1948.0007
- The paper
- Pringle, J. W. S. (1948). The gyroscopic mechanism of the halteres of Diptera. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1948.0007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.