The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A computer implementation of a theory of human stereo vision
Open accessAbstract
Recently, Marr & Poggio (1979) presented a theory of human stereo vision. An implem entation of that theory is presented, and consists of five steps, (i) The left and right images are each filtered with masks of four sizes that increase with eccentricity; the shape of these masks is given by ∇2G, the Laplacian of a Gaussian function, (ii) Zero crossings in the filtered images are found along horizontal scan lines, (iii) For each mask size, matching takes place between zero crossings of the same sign and roughly the same orientation in the two images, for a range of disparities up to about the width of the mask’s central region. Within this disparity range, it can be shown that false targets pose only a simple problem, (iv) The output of the wide masks can control vergence movements, thus causing small masks to come into correspondence. In this way, the matching process gradually moves from dealing with large disparities at a low resolution to dealing with small disparities at a high resolution, (v) When a correspondence is achieved, it is stored in a dynamic buffer, called the 2 1/2-dimensional sketch. To support the adequacy of the Marr-Poggio model of human stereo vision, the implementation was tested on a wide range of stereograms from the human stereopsis literature. The performance of the implementation is illustrated and compared with human perception. Also statistical assumptions made by Marr & Poggio are supported by comparison with statistics found in practice. Finally, the process of implementing the theory has led to the clarification and refinement of a number of details within the theory; these are discussed in detail.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marr, D., & Hildreth, E. (1980) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1980.0020 · Cited by 6,510
Cited by
Segmentation through variable-order surface fitting
Besl, P. J., & Jain, R. C. (1988) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.3881 · Cited by 1,074
Stereo by Intra- and Inter-Scanline Search Using Dynamic Programming
Ohta, Y., & Kanade, T. (1985) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1985.4767639 · Cited by 932
Structure from stereo-a review
Dhond, U. R., & Aggarwal, J. K. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.44067 · Cited by 867
Model-Based Recognition and Localization from Sparse Range or Tactile Data
Grimson, W. E. L., & Lozano-Pérez, T. (1984) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/027836498400300301 · Cited by 586
Self-citationDisplacement vectors derived from second-order intensity variations in image sequences
Nagel, H.-H. (1983) · Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing · doi:10.1016/s0734-189x(83)80030-9 · Cited by 428
Metadata
- Authors
- Grimson, W. E. L.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1981-05-12
- Volume
- 292
- Issue
- 1058
- Pages
- 217-253
- ISSN
- 0080-4622 (ISSN-L)
- 2054-0280
- OpenAlex
- W2167558105
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 47.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A computer implementation of a theory of human stereo vision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.1981.0031
- The paper
- Grimson, W. E. L. (1981). A computer implementation of a theory of human stereo vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1981.0031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.