The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of differences in mineralization on the mechanical properties of bone
Abstract
There is a considerable variation in the mineralization of bone; normal, non-pathological compact bone has ash masses ranging from 45 to 85% by mass. This range of mineralization results in an even greater range of mechanical properties. The Young modulus of elasticity can range from 4 to 32 GPa, bending strength from 50 to 300 MPa, and the work of fracture from 200 to 7000 Jm-2. It is not possible for any one type of bone to have high values for all three properties. Very high values of mineralization produce high values of Young modulus but low values of work of fracture (which is a measure of fracture toughness). Rather low values of mineralization are associated with high values of work of fracture but low values of Young modulus and intermediate values of bending strength. The reason for the high value for the Young modulus associated with high mineralization is intuitively obvious, but has not yet been rigorously modelled. The low fracture toughness associated with high mineralization may be caused by the failure of various crack-stopping mechanisms that can act when the mineral crystals in bone have not coalesced, but which become ineffective when the volume fraction of mineral becomes too high. The adoption of different degrees of mineralization by different bones, leading to different sets of mechanical properties, is shown to be adaptive in most cases studied, but some puzzles still remain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme
Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0086 · Cited by 7,770
Bone Compressive Strength: The Influence of Density and Strain Rate
Carter, D. R., & Hayes, W. C. (1976) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.996549 · Cited by 709
The mechanical properties of bone.
Evans, F. G. (1969) · PubMed · Cited by 587
The work of fracture and its measurement in metals, ceramics and other materials
Tattersall, H. G., & Tappin, G. (1966) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/bf00550177 · Cited by 450
Mechanical properties of bone tissues with greatly differing functions
Currey, J. D. (1979) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(79)90073-3 · Cited by 291
Self-citationHard tissue as a composite material—I. Bounds on the elastic behavior
Katz, J. L. (1971) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(71)90064-9 · Cited by 254
Three analogies to explain the mechanical properties of bone
Currey, J. D. (1964) · Biorheology · doi:10.3233/bir-1964-2101 · Cited by 180
Self-citationTensile Fracture of Cancellous Bone
Carter, D. R. P., Schwab, G. H., & Spengler, D. M. (1980) · Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica · doi:10.3109/17453678008990868 · Cited by 144
The role of collagen in the elastic properties of calcified tissues
Lees, S., & Davidson, C. L. (1977) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(77)90101-4 · Cited by 99
Currey, J. D., & Brear, K. (1974) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/bf02059054 · Cited by 54
Self-citation
Cited by
Control and Design Principles in Biological Mineralization
Addadi, L., & Weiner, S. (1992) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English · doi:10.1002/anie.199201531 · Cited by 890
Biological materials: Functional adaptations and bioinspired designs
Chen, P.-Y., McKittrick, J., & Meyers, M. A. (2012) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2012.03.001 · Cited by 766
Lamellar Bone: Structure–Function Relations
Weiner, S., Traub, W., & Wagner, H. D. (1999) · Journal of Structural Biology · doi:10.1006/jsbi.1999.4107 · Cited by 674
Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone
Keller, T. S. (1994) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(94)90056-6 · Cited by 667
Association of low-energy femoral fractures with prolonged bisphosphonate use: a case control study
Lenart, B. A., Neviaser, A. S., Lyman, S., Chang, C. C., Edobor-Osula, F., Steele, B., van der Meulen, M. C. H., Lorich, D. G., & Lane, J. M. (2009) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-008-0805-x · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Currey, J. D.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1984-02-13
- Volume
- 304
- Issue
- 1121
- Pages
- 509-518
- ISSN
- 0080-4622 (ISSN-L)
- 2054-0280
- OpenAlex
- W1996131009
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of differences in mineralization on the mechanical properties of bone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.1984.0042
- The paper
- Currey, J. D. (1984). Effects of differences in mineralization on the mechanical properties of bone. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1984.0042
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.