Cited by 48Cephalopods and Marine BiologyMarine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Central pathways of the nerves of the arms and mantle of Octopus

Budelmann, B. U., Young, John Zachary·1985·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences

Abstract

Centripetal cobalt filling of a brachial nerve of Octopus gave further information about the organization of its tactile learning system. Efferent fibres pass from the posterior buccal and subvertical lobes direct to the arms. Afferent fibres from the arms pass to the lateral and median inferior frontal lobes, others to the lateral and median superior frontal lobes, and a third set to the subvertical lobe. None reach to the vertical or subfrontal lobes. Many somata and afferent fibres were filled in the magnocellular lobes after filling either the brachial or pallial nerves. This is probably a region from which escape reactions are initiated. The lower part of the median basal lobe also receives afferents from both these nerves and a few somata were filled at the lower edge of this lobe. It probably controls the magnocellular lobe, lying below it. After filling of a brachial nerve, or the pallial nerve, somata were filled in both the anterior and posterior chromatophore lobes, but few or no afferent fibres were filled in these lobes. After filling of a brachial nerve many somata and afferent fibres were filled in the prebrachial and brachial lobes and in the anterior pedal lobe, and many fine afferent fibres and a few somata were filled in the superior buccal lobe. After filling of the pallial nerve some filled fibres run forwards to the brachial lobe, but no somata were filled there. No filled fibres from either the brachial or pallial nerves were seen proceeding towards the optic lobes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.1985.0101

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The brachial ganglia serve as local sensorimotor integration centers for their corresponding suckers and nearby arm musculature, and account for about 350 million of the octopus's over 500 million neurons.

    “These ganglia serve as local sensorimotor integration centers for their corresponding suckers and nearby arm musculature, and account for about 350 million of the octopus’s over 500 million neurons (Young, 1963; Rowell, 1966; Budelmann and Young, 1985).”

    From Lessons for Robotics From the Control Architecture of the Octopus (2022) · cites this paper as Budelmann and Young, 1985

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Budelmann, B. U., & Young, J. Z.
Affiliations
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
  • Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine (GB)
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences
Published
1985-08-31
Volume
310
Issue
1143
Pages
109-122
ISSN
  • 0080-4622 (ISSN-L)
  • 2054-0280
OpenAlex
W2128606885
Cited by
48
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Cephalopods and Marine Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
octopus, afferent nerve fibers, inferior frontal lobe, escape reaction, tactile learning, cephalopod neuroanatomy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review