The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Repetitive DNA and chromosome evolution in plants
Abstract
Most higher plant genomes contain a high proportion of repeated sequences. Thus repetitive DNA is a major contributor to plant chromosome structure. The variation in total DNA content between species is due mostly to variation in repeated DNA content. Some repeats of the same family are arranged in tandem arrays, at the sites of heterochromatin. Examples from the Secale genus are described. Arrays of the same sequence are often present at many chromosomal sites. Heterochromatin often contains arrays of several unrelated sequences. The evolution of such arrays in populations is discussed. Other repeats are dispersed at many locations in the chromosomes. Many are likely to be or have evolved from transposable elements. The structures of some plant transposable elements, in particular the sequences of the terminal inverted repeats, are described. Some elements in soybean, antirrhinum and maize have the same inverted terminal repeat sequences. Other elements of maize and wheat share terminal homology with elements from yeast, Drosophila, man and mouse. The evolution of transposable elements in plant populations is discussed. The amplification, deletion and transposition of different repeated DNA sequences and the spread of the mutations in populations produces a turnover of repetitive DNA during evolution. This turnover process and the molecular mechanisms involved are discussed and shown to be responsible for divergence of chromosome structure between species. Turnover of repeated genes also occurs. The molecular processes affecting repeats imply that the older a repetitive DNA family the more likely it is to exist in different forms and in many locations within a species. Examples to support this hypothesis are provided from the Secale genus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bureau, T. E., & Wessler, S. R. (1994) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.6.6.907 · Cited by 346
Long terminal repeat retrotransposons of Oryza sativa
McCarthy, E. M., Liu, J., Lizhi, G., & McDonald, J. F. (2002) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2002-3-10-research0053 · Cited by 139
Genomic Analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans Reveals Ancient Families of Retroviral-like Elements
Bowen, N. J., & McDonald, J. F. (1999) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.9.10.924 · Cited by 102
Long terminal repeat retrotransposons of Mus musculus
McCarthy, E. M., & McDonald, J. F. (2004) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-3-r14 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Flavell, R. B.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1986-01-29
- Volume
- 312
- Issue
- 1154
- Pages
- 227-242
- ISSN
- 0080-4622 (ISSN-L)
- 2054-0280
- OpenAlex
- W2108336999
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Repetitive DNA and chromosome evolution in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.1986.0004
- The paper
- Flavell, R. B. (1986). Repetitive DNA and chromosome evolution in plants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1986.0004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.