CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 157Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesAvian ecology and behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Food-storing birds: adaptive specialization in brain and behaviour?

Krebs, John Richard·1990·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
DOI 10.1098/rstb.1990.0160
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Among the passerine birds, species that store food have an enlarged hippocampal region (dorso-medial cortex), relative to brain and body size, when compared with the non-storers. The volume of one of the major afferent-efferent pathways (the septo-hippocampal pathway) is also greater in food storing species. This specialization of brain structure is discussed in relation to behavioural studies in which the spatial memory of storing and non-storing species has been compared.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.1990.0160

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Krushinskaya N. L, 1966, Some complex forms of feeding behaviour of nutcracker Nucifraga caryocatactes, after removal of old cortex, Zhurn. Evol. Biochim. Fisiol., 2, 563
  2. Nucifragacolumbiana) in an analogue Anim. Behav. Proc. 2 97-116.
  3. Brodbeck D. R. 1989 Memory for trial-unique food locations in chickadees. M.A. thesis University ofToronto.
  4. Pisana M. 1986 Cytoarchitecture and connectional organization in the telencephalic medial wall of the domestic chick. D.Phil. thesis University of Sussex.
  5. 10.1037/0097-7403.14.1.71 · DOI
  6. D)J. comp. Neurol. 61 Behav. Proc. 12 248-257.
  7. Hilton S. C. & Krebs J. R. 1990 Performance of four species of tits in a radial maze. Q. Jl exp. Psychol. (In the press.)
  8. Smith G. T. 1989 Cell types and organization of the dorsomedial forebrain of the great tit (Parus major) and the marsh tit {Parus palustris): a Golgi study. Honours thesis Cornell University.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–157 of 157

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Krebs, J. R.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Krebs, John Richard
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Publisher
The Royal Society
Published
1990-08-29
Volume
329
Issue
1253
Pages
153-160
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
DOI
10.1098/rstb.1990.0160
OpenAlex
W2160395554
Cited by
157
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
Keywords
Passeriformes, hippocampus, brain size, septohippocampal pathway, spatial memory
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Birds, Brain, Feeding Behavior, Hippocampus, Memory, Species Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review