Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 384

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Empirical evidence that declining species diversity may alter the performance of terrestrial ecosystems

Naeem, Shahid, Naeem, Shahid, Thompson, Lindsey J., Lawler, Sharon P., Lawton, John Hartley, Woodfin, Richard M.·1995·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

We examined experimentally the association between species diversity and ecosystem processes in a series of terrestrial mesocosms. We developed and maintained 14 mesocosms whose biota were assembled from a single pool of plant and animal species and whose environmental conditions were identically controlled. Each community contained four trophic levels: primary producers (annual herbs), consumers (herbivorous molluscs and phloem sucking insects), secondary consumers (parasitoids) and decomposers (earthworms, Collembola and microbes). All mesocosms received the same diurnal pattern of light, temperature, relative humidity and water. The initial volume of soil, soil structure, composition, nutrient content and inocula of both soil microbes and nematodes were also identical among replicates. The only experimentally manipulated factor was the number of plant and animal species within each trophic level. High, medium and low diversity communities had nine, 15 or 31 plant and animal species, respectively. We measured five ecosystem processes as response variables in these mesocosms over the course of 206 days: (i) community respiration; (ii) productivity; (iii) decomposition; (iv) nutrient retention; and (v) water retention. The manipulation of diversity produced communities that differed significantly in their ecosystem processes. Our results provide the first evidence (obtained by a direct manipulation of diversity under controlled environmental conditions) that ecosystem processes may be affected by loss of diversity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.1995.0025

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 384

Metadata

Authors
Naeem, S., Naeem, S., Thompson, L. J., Lawler, S. P., Lawton, J. H., & Woodfin, R. M.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
1995-02-28
Volume
347
Issue
1321
Pages
249-262
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W1999702548
Cited by
384
References
2
FWCI
20.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Empirical evidence that declining species diversity may alter the performance of terrestrial ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.1995.0025
The paper
Naeem, S., Naeem, S., Thompson, L. J., Lawler, S. P., Lawton, J. H., & Woodfin, R. M. (1995). Empirical evidence that declining species diversity may alter the performance of terrestrial ecosystems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1995.0025

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.