Cited by 375Visual perception and processing mechanismsPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceMultisensory perception and integration

Single units and conscious vision

Open access
The American Association for Research into Nervous and Mental Diseases, Logothetis, N. K.·1998·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Figures that can be seen in more than one way are invaluable tools for the study of the neural basis of visual awareness, because such stimuli permit the dissociation of the neural responses that underlie what we perceive at any given time from those forming the sensory representation of a visual pattern. To study the former type of responses, monkeys were subjected to binocular rivalry, and the response of neurons in a number of different visual areas was studied while the animals reported their alternating percepts by pulling levers. Perception–related modulations of neural activity were found to occur to different extents in different cortical visual areas. The cells that were affected by suppression were almost exclusively binocular, and their proportion was found to increase in the higher processing stages of the visual system. The strongest correlations between neural activity and perception were observed in the visual areas of the temporal lobe. A strikingly large number of neurons in the early visual areas remained active during the perceptual suppression of the stimulus, a finding suggesting that conscious visual perception might be mediated by only a subset of the cells exhibiting stimulus selective responses. These physiological findings, together with a number of recent psychophysical studies, offer a new explanation of the phenomenon of binocular rivalry. Indeed, rivalry has long been considered to be closely linked with binocular fusion and stereopsis, and the sequences of dominance and suppression have been viewed as the result of competition between the two monocular channels. The physiological data presented here are incompatible with this interpretation. Rather than reflecting interocular competition, the rivalry is most probably between the two different central neural representations generated by the dichoptically presented stimuli. The mechanisms of rivalry are probably the same as, or very similar to, those underlying multistable perception in general, and further physiological studies might reveal a much about the neural mechanisms of our perceptual organization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.1998.0333

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In rhesus monkeys, it seems to be possible to assess what an animal is perceiving.

    “Although it is challenging to assess what an animal is perceiving, in rhesus monkeys, for example, it seems to be possible78,79.”

    From Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom (2008) · cites this paper as [78]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 162 · Cited by 375

Authors
The American Association for Research into Nervous and Mental Diseases, & Logothetis, N. K.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (DE)
Corresponding author
The American Association for Research into Nervous and Mental Diseases
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
1998-11-29
Volume
353
Issue
1377
Pages
1801-1818
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2135403611
Cited by
375
References
162
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 15
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
binocular rivalry, visual awareness, multistable perception, perceptual suppression, binocular neurons, dichoptic stimuli, perceptual organization, single-unit recording
MeSH terms
Animals, Haplorhini, Consciousness, Electrophysiology, Geniculate Bodies, Neurons, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychophysics, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception, Vision, Binocular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review