Disentangling weak coherence and executive dysfunction: planning drawing in autism and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Open accessAbstract
A tendency to focus on details at the expense of configural information, ‘weak coherence’, has been proposed as a cognitive style in autism. In the present study we tested whether weak coherence might be the result of executive dysfunction, by testing clinical groups known to show deficits on tests of executive control. Boys with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) were compared with age– and intelligence quotient (IQ)–matched boys with attention–deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and typically developing (TD) boys, on a drawing task requiring planning for the inclusion of a new element. Weak coherence was measured through analysis of drawing style. In line with the predictions made, the ASD group was more detail–focused in their drawings than were either ADHD or TD boys. The ASD and ADHD groups both showed planning impairments, which were more severe in the former group. Poor planning did not, however, predict detail–focus, and scores on the two aspects of the task were unrelated in the clinical groups. These findings indicate that weak coherence may indeed be a cognitive style specific to autism and unrelated to cognitive deficits in frontal functions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is evidence for the partly distinct disorder hypothesis, with ASD children having cognitive problems qualitatively different from those of children with ADHD.
“In contrast, there is also evidence for the (partly) distinct disorder hypothesis, with ASD children having cognitive problems that are qualitative different from those of children with ADHD.[25][26][27]”
This normal-to-superior performance contrasted with this class's poorer performance on nearly all other domains and matched prior studies.
“This normal-to-superior performance clearly stands out against the background of poorer performance of this class on almost all other domains measured, and is in line with previous studies.26,50”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 173
- Authors
- Booth, R., Charlton, R., Hughes, C., & Happé, F.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Research Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, DeCrespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, UK
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2003-02-28
- Volume
- 358
- Issue
- 1430
- Pages
- 387-392
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- PMC
- PMC1693126
- OpenAlex
- W2085864129
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- St George's Online Research Archive (St George's University of London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Keywords
- executive dysfunction, autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, planning, configural information, drawing style, cognitive style, frontal lobe function, boys
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Autistic Disorder, Child, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Humans, Male, Psychological Tests, Psychological Theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review