The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Generating carbon finance through avoided deforestation and its potential to create climatic, conservation and human development benefits
Open accessAbstract
Recent proposals to compensate developing countries for reducing emissions from deforestation (RED) under forthcoming climate change mitigation regimes are receiving increasing attention. Here we demonstrate that if RED credits were traded on international carbon markets, even moderate decreases in deforestation rates could generate billions of Euros annually for tropical forest conservation. We also discuss the main challenges for a RED mechanism that delivers real climatic benefits. These include providing sufficient incentives while only rewarding deforestation reductions beyond business-as-usual scenarios, addressing risks arising from forest degradation and international leakage, and ensuring permanence of emission reductions. Governance may become a formidable challenge for RED because some countries with the highest RED potentials score poorly on governance indices. In addition to climate mitigation, RED funds could help achieve substantial co-benefits for biodiversity conservation and human development. However, this will probably require targeted additional support because the highest biodiversity threats and human development needs may exist in countries that have limited income potentials from RED. In conclusion, how successfully a market-based RED mechanism can contribute to climate change mitigation, conservation and development will strongly depend on accompanying measures and carefully designed incentive structures involving governments, business, as well as the conservation and development communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35002501 · Cited by 31,710
Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020
(2020) · doi:10.4060/ca9825en · Cited by 3,408
Forest transitions: towards a global understanding of land use change
Rudel, T. K., Coomes, O. T., Moran, E., Achard, F., Angelsen, A., Xu, J., & Lambin, E. (2005) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.11.001 · Cited by 1,387
Cited by
Moving ahead with REDD: issues, options and implications
A., A., & (eds.) (2008) · Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks · doi:10.17528/cifor/002601 · Cited by 606
Miles, L., & Kapos, V. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1155358 · Cited by 483
Carbon pools recover more quickly than plant biodiversity in tropical secondary forests
Martin, P. A., Newton, A. C., & Bullock, J. M. (2013) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.2236 · Cited by 358
Targeting perennial vegetation in agricultural landscapes for enhancing ecosystem services
Asbjornsen, H., Hernandez-Santana, V., Liebman, M., Bayala, J., Chen, J., Helmers, M., Ong, C. K., & Schulte, L. A. (2014) · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems · doi:10.1017/s1742170512000385 · Cited by 326
Measuring the Co-Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation
Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Herrero, S. T., Dubash, N. K., & Lecocq, F. (2014) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-031312-125456 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Ebeling, J., & Yasué, M.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2008-02-11
- Volume
- 363
- Issue
- 1498
- Pages
- 1917-1924
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2125741084
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 27.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generating carbon finance through avoided deforestation and its potential to create climatic, conservation and human development benefits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2007.0029
- The paper
- Ebeling, J., & Yasué, M. (2008). Generating carbon finance through avoided deforestation and its potential to create climatic, conservation and human development benefits. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.0029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.