Cited by 265Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementForest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies

A large-scale forest fragmentation experiment: the Stability of Altered Forest Ecosystems Project

Open access
Ewers, Robert M., Didham, Raphael K., Fahrig, Lenore, Ferraz, Gonçalo, Hector, Andy, Holt, Robert D., Kapos, Valerie, Reynolds, Glen +3 more·2011·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Opportunities to conduct large-scale field experiments are rare, but provide a unique opportunity to reveal the complex processes that operate within natural ecosystems. Here, we review the design of existing, large-scale forest fragmentation experiments. Based on this review, we develop a design for the Stability of Altered Forest Ecosystems (SAFE) Project, a new forest fragmentation experiment to be located in the lowland tropical forests of Borneo (Sabah, Malaysia). The SAFE Project represents an advance on existing experiments in that it: (i) allows discrimination of the effects of landscape-level forest cover from patch-level processes; (ii) is designed to facilitate the unification of a wide range of data types on ecological patterns and processes that operate over a wide range of spatial scales; (iii) has greater replication than existing experiments; (iv) incorporates an experimental manipulation of riparian corridors; and (v) embeds the experimentally fragmented landscape within a wider gradient of land-use intensity than do existing projects. The SAFE Project represents an opportunity for ecologists across disciplines to participate in a large initiative designed to generate a broad understanding of the ecological impacts of tropical forest modification.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2011.0049

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 265

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry. 3rd Edition ed. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company; 1995.

Authors
Ewers, R. M., Didham, R. K., Fahrig, L., Ferraz, G., Hector, A., Holt, R. D., Kapos, V., Reynolds, G., Sinun, W., Snaddon, J. L., & Turner, E. C.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • School of Animal Biology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia
  • Carleton University (CA)
  • Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (PA)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (GB)
  • Royal Society (GB)
  • Conservation and Environmental Management Division, Yayasan Sabah Group, Menara Tun Mustapha, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah 88817, Malaysia
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Ewers, Robert M.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2011-11-27
Volume
366
Issue
1582
Pages
3292-3302
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2141611781
Cited by
265
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • Yayasan Sime Darby
  • Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Keywords
forest fragmentation, large-scale field experiment, experimental design, lowland tropical forest, landscape-scale effects, riparian corridors, ecosystem stability, replication, Borneo
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Altitude, Borneo, Conservation of Natural Resources, Malaysia, Trees, Tropical Climate, Ecosystem, Arecaceae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review