Many human accelerated regions are developmental enhancers
Open accessAbstract
The genetic changes underlying the dramatic differences in form and function between humans and other primates are largely unknown, although it is clear that gene regulatory changes play an important role. To identify regulatory sequences with potentially human-specific functions, we and others used comparative genomics to find non-coding regions conserved across mammals that have acquired many sequence changes in humans since divergence from chimpanzees. These regions are good candidates for performing human-specific regulatory functions. Here, we analysed the DNA sequence, evolutionary history, histone modifications, chromatin state and transcription factor (TF) binding sites of a combined set of 2649 non-coding human accelerated regions (ncHARs) and predicted that at least 30% of them function as developmental enhancers. We prioritized the predicted ncHAR enhancers using analysis of TF binding site gain and loss, along with the functional annotations and expression patterns of nearby genes. We then tested both the human and chimpanzee sequence for 29 ncHARs in transgenic mice, and found 24 novel developmental enhancers active in both species, 17 of which had very consistent patterns of activity in specific embryonic tissues. Of these ncHAR enhancers, five drove expression patterns suggestive of different activity for the human and chimpanzee sequence at embryonic day 11.5. The changes to human non-coding DNA in these ncHAR enhancers may modify the complex patterns of gene expression necessary for proper development in a human-specific manner and are thus promising candidates for understanding the genetic basis of human-specific biology.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Crossing the 312 zooHAR elements with a compiled dataset of 2,649 previously identified HARs found only 105 coincidental sequences between these two datasets.
“By crossing these 312 zooHAR elements with a compiled dataset of the 2,649 previously identified HARs (Capra et al. 2013; Kamm et al. 2013b), we found only 105 coincidental sequences between these two datasets”
From The Human Accelerated Region HAR202 Controls <i>NPAS3</i> Expression in the Developing Forebrain Displaying Differential Enhancer Activity Between Modern and Archaic Human Sequences (2024) · cites this paper as Capra et al. 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 57 · Cited by 235
- Authors
- Capra, J. A., Erwin, G. D., McKinsey, G., Rubenstein, J. L. R., & Pollard, K. S.
- Affiliations
- Gladstone Institutes (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- Capra, John A.
- Pollard, Katherine S.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2013-12-19
- Volume
- 368
- Issue
- 1632
- Pages
- 20130025
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- PMC
- PMC3826498
- OpenAlex
- W2133663604
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL098179, UM1HL098179, U01HL098179)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM082901, GM082901, T32GM067547)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK063720)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS034661, R01NS099099)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Keywords
- human accelerated regions, non-coding regulatory elements, developmental enhancers, human-chimpanzee divergence, gene regulatory evolution, transcription factor binding sites, histone modifications, chromatin state, comparative genomics
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Pan troglodytes, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Humans, Mice, Transgenic, Molecular Sequence Data, Species Specificity, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Evolution, Molecular, Genomics, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review