Cited by 55Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringVisual perception and processing mechanismsTactile and Sensory Interactions

Pulse trains to percepts: the challenge of creating a perceptually intelligible world with sight recovery technologies

Open access
Fine, Ione, Boynton, Geoffrey M.·2015·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

An extraordinary variety of sight recovery therapies are either about to begin clinical trials, have begun clinical trials, or are currently being implanted in patients. However, as yet we have little insight into the perceptual experience likely to be produced by these implants. This review focuses on methodologies, such as optogenetics, small molecule photoswitches and electrical prostheses, which use artificial stimulation of the retina to elicit percepts. For each of these technologies, the interplay between the stimulating technology and the underlying neurophysiology is likely to result in distortions of the perceptual experience. Here, we describe some of these potential distortions and discuss how they might be minimized either through changes in the encoding model or through cortical plasticity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2014.0208

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 83 · Cited by 55

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]2. Bamann C, Nagel G, Bamberg E. 2010 Microbial rhodopsins in the spotlight. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 20 , 610-616. (doi:10.1016/j.conb.2010.07.003) · DOI
  2. [32]32. Dacey D. 2004 20 Origins of perception: retinal ganglion cell diversity and the creation of parallel visual pathways. In The cognitive neurosciences III (ed. MS Gazzaniga), p. 281. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Authors
Fine, I., & Boynton, G. M.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2015-09-19
Volume
370
Issue
1677
Pages
20140208
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W1902485499
Cited by
55
References
83
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Eye Institute (R01EY014645, EY-12925, R01EY-12925, EY014645, R01EY012925)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
retinal prosthesis, optogenetics, visual perception, perceptual distortion, encoding models, cortical plasticity
MeSH terms
Electric Stimulation Therapy, Humans, Models, Biological, Retina, Vision Disorders, Visual Perception, Visual Prosthesis, Optogenetics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review