Palaeoecology of Cambrian-Ordovician acritarchs from China: evidence for a progressive invasion of the marine habitats
Open accessAbstract
Palaeozoic acritarchs mostly represent organic-walled cysts of marine phytoplankton, and therefore, as primary producers, played an important role in the evolution of marine ecosystems. In this study, we use a selection of the most abundant acritarch taxa from the Cambrian and Ordovician of China to understand the evolution of the palaeoecological patterns of the phytoplankton over the period. The taxa are attributed to 40 easily distinguishable morphotypes, of which the precise palaeoenvironmental distribution from 60 localities is available. By placing the 40 morphotypes on inshore–offshore transects it can be concluded that acritarch microfloras were limited to inshore environments during the early Cambrian, and progressively extended from inshore environments to offshore marine habitats during the later parts of the Cambrian and towards the Early Ordovician, with a prominent shift near the Cambrian–Ordovician boundary, confirming the onset of the ‘Ordovician plankton revolution’. In addition, the acritarch morphotypes evolved from low-diversity assemblages in the early Cambrian, dominated by simple spherical forms with limited ornamentation and simple process structures, to highly diverse assemblages with very complex morphologies in the Early and Middle Ordovician. During the Ordovician, the complex acritarch assemblages occupied most marine habitats, with palaeoecological distribution patterns similar to modern dinoflagellates. This article is part of the theme issue ‘The impact of Chinese palaeontology on evolutionary research’.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The open waters were progressively occupied from the middle Cambrian onwards to the Late Ordovician by planktonic-nektonic organisms.
“it becomes obvious that the open waters were progressively occupied from the middle Cambrian onwards to the Late Ordovician by planktonic-nektonic or ganisms (see also Shan et al., 2022).”
From No (Cambrian) explosion and no (Ordovician) event: A single long-term radiation in the early Palaeozoic (2023) · cites this paper as Shan et al., 2022
Cites
Cascading trend of Early Paleozoic marine radiations paused by Late Ordovician extinctions
Rasmussen, C. M. Ø., Kröger, B., Nielsen, M. L., & Colmenar, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1821123116 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
The Qingjiang biota—A Burgess Shale–type fossil Lagerstätte from the early Cambrian of South China
Fu, D., Tong, G., Dai, T., Liu, W., Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., Cui, L., Li, L., Yun, H., Wu, Y., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau8800 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Self-citationThe plankton and the benthos: origins and early history of an evolving relationship
Signor, P. W., & Vermeij, G. J. (1994) · Paleobiology · doi:10.1017/s0094837300012793 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Macroevolutionary interplay between planktic larvae and benthic predators
Peterson, K. J. (2005) · Geology · doi:10.1130/g21697.1 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
It’s Time to Defuse the Cambrian “Explosion”
Beasecker, J., Chamberlin, Z., Lane, N., Reynolds, K., Stack, J., Wahrer, K., Wolff, A., Devilbliss, J., Wahr, C., Durbin, D., et al. (2020) · GSA Today · doi:10.1130/gsatg460gw.1 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Servais, T., Cascales-Miñana, B., Harper, D. A. T., Lefebvre, B., Munnecke, A., Wang, W., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology · doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2023.111592 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Shan, L., Yan, K., Zhang, Y., Li, J., & Servais, T.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Yan, Kui
- Servais, Thomas
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2022-02-07
- Volume
- 377
- Issue
- 1847
- Pages
- 20210035-20210035
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- PMC
- PMC8819361
- OpenAlex
- W4210827939
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (42030510)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB26000000)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
- Keywords
- acritarchs, Cambrian, Ordovician, phytoplankton evolution, paleoecology, Cambrian-Ordovician boundary
- MeSH terms
- Biological Evolution, Fossils, Paleontology, Phytoplankton, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review