The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Characterization of Azorhizobium caulinodans gen. nov., sp. nov., a Stem-Nodulating Nitrogen-Fixing Bacterium Isolated from Sesbania rostrata
Abstract
Twenty stem- and root-nodulating bacterial strains isolated from stem nodules of Sesbania rostrata were compared by numerical analysis of 221 phenotypic features with nine strains which effectively nodulate only the roots of this plant and with representative strains from the genera Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium. Representative organisms from the different clusters were investigated further, together with possibly related organisms, by performing comparative gel electrophoresis of whole-cell proteins and by performing deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-DNA and DNA-ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) hybridizations. 3H-labeled rRNA was prepared from Sesbania stem- and root-nodulating bacterial strain ORS 571T (T = type strain); [14C]rRNA from Bradyrhizobium japonicum NZP 5549T was also used. The following conclusions were drawn: (i) the Sesbania root-nodulating bacterial strains are genuine rhizobia; (ii) the Sesbania stem- and root-nodulating strains are quite different from Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium, and thus they constitute a separate rRNA subbranch on the Rhodopseudomonas palustris rRNA branch in rRNA superfamily IV; and (iii) the closest relative of these organisms is Xanthobacter, but they are phenotypically and genotypically sufficiently different from the latter genus to deserve a separate generic rank. Because the feature of free-living nitrogen fixation is quite discriminative, a new genus, Azorhizobium, is proposed, with one species, Azorhizobium caulinodans. The type strain is strain ORS 571 (= LMG 6465).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mylona, P., Pawlowski, K., & Bisseling, T. (1995) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.7.7.869 · Cited by 692
Rhijn, P. V., & Vanderleyden, J. (1995) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.59.1.124-142.1995 · Cited by 600
Diversity and phylogeny of rhizobia
PETER, J., YOUNG, W., & HAUKKA, K. E. (1996) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb04344.x · Cited by 323
Advances in Rhizobium Research
Sessitsch, A., Howieson, J. G., Perret, X., Antoun, H., & Martínez-Romero, E. (2002) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/0735-260291044278 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- DREYFUS, B., GARCIA, J. L., & GILLIS, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1988-01-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-98
- ISSN
- 0020-7713 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2102
- OpenAlex
- W2145978807
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of Azorhizobium caulinodans gen. nov., sp. nov., a Stem-Nodulating Nitrogen-Fixing Bacterium Isolated from Sesbania rostrata. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00207713-38-1-89
- The paper
- DREYFUS, B., GARCIA, J. L., & GILLIS, M. (1988). Characterization of Azorhizobium caulinodans gen. nov., sp. nov., a Stem-Nodulating Nitrogen-Fixing Bacterium Isolated from Sesbania rostrata. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-38-1-89
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.