The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deoxyribonucleic Acid Homology Studies of Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus paracasei sp. nov., subsp. paracasei and subsp. tolerans, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus sp. nov., comb. nov.
Abstract
Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-DNA hybridizations were performed on strains of Lactobacillus casei. Our results indicate that this species as presently constituted is genomically very heterogeneous. The majority of strains designated L. casei subsp. casei, together with members of L. casei subsp. alactosus, L. casei subsp. pseudoplantarum, and L. casei subsp. tolerans, exhibited high levels of DNA relatedness with each other but were distinct from the type strain of L. casei subsp. casei. Strains of L. casei subsp. rhamnosus also formed a genomically homogeneous group unrelated to all members of the other L. casei subspecies examined. On the basis of the present and previous findings we suggest that members of L. casei subsp. alactosus, L. casei subsp. pseudoplantarum, and L. casei subsp. tolerans and the majority of L. casei subsp. casei strains be given separate species status, for which we propose the names L. paracasei sp. nov., L. paracasei subsp. paracasei (type strain, NCDO 151), and L. paracasei subsp. tolerans (type strain ATCC 25599). We also propose that L. casei subsp. rhamnosus be elevated to species status, as L. rhamnosus sp. nov. (type strain, ATCC 7469).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A medium for the cultivation of lactobacilli
De MAN, J. C., ROGOSA, M., & SHARPE, M. E. (1960) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1960.tb00188.x · Cited by 5,311
Cited by
Zheng, J., Wittouck, S., Salvetti, E., Franz, C. M. A. P., Harris, H. M. B., Mattarelli, P., O’Toole, P. W., Pot, B., Vandamme, P., Walter, J., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.004107 · Cited by 3,313
The lactic acid bacteria: A literature survey
Carr, F. J., Chill, D., & Maida, N. (2002) · Critical Reviews in Microbiology · doi:10.1080/1040-840291046759 · Cited by 724
The Genera Lactobacillus and Carnobacterium
(2011) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_3731 · Cited by 382
De Angelis, M., Corsetti, A., Tosti, N., Rossi, J., Corbo, M. R., & Gobbetti, M. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.5.2011-2020.2001 · Cited by 192
Fitzsimons, N. A., Cogan, T. M., Condon, S., & Beresford, T. (1999) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.65.8.3418-3426.1999 · Cited by 186
Metadata
- Authors
- COLLINS, M. D., PHILLIPS, B. A., & ZANONI, P.
- Venue
- International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1989-04-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105-108
- ISSN
- 0020-7713 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2102
- OpenAlex
- W2132689762
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deoxyribonucleic Acid Homology Studies of Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus paracasei sp. nov., subsp. paracasei and subsp. tolerans, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus sp. nov., comb. nov. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00207713-39-2-105
- The paper
- COLLINS, M. D., PHILLIPS, B. A., & ZANONI, P. (1989). Deoxyribonucleic Acid Homology Studies of Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus paracasei sp. nov., subsp. paracasei and subsp. tolerans, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus sp. nov., comb. nov. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-39-2-105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
