The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Taxonomic Study of Viridans Streptococci: Description of Streptococcus gordonii sp. nov. and Emended Descriptions of Streptococcus sanguis (White and Niven 1946), Streptococcus oralis (Bridge and Sneath 1982), and Streptococcus mitis (Andrewes and Horder 1906)
Abstract
We examined a collection of 151 strains of the viridans type of streptococci, which were isolated mainly from human oral cavities and included several reference strains, in an attempt to revise and improve the taxonomy of this group of bacteria. Our examinations included determinations of a high number of biochemical and physiological characteristics and serological reactivity. The resulting data revealed several hitherto unrecognized characters of taxonomic significance, and several of the species can now be more accurately defined. A diagnostic key to the taxa is presented. Strains previously identified as Streptococcus sanguis could be divided into two clearly distinct species, Streptococcus sanguis sensu stricto (type strain, ATCC 10556) and a new species, Streptococcus gordonii (type strain, ATCC 10558). Streptococcus mitis was divided into two biovars, consisting of strains possessing group O antigens and strains possessing group K antigen. The group of strains assigned to Streptococcus anginosus was biochemically and serologically heterogeneous, but the data did not allow natural subdivisions. Based on the results of this study, emended descriptions of the species Streptococcus oralis, S. mitis, and S. sanguis are provided. The classification resulting from this study is in complete agreement with previously published genetic data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
What Happened to the Streptococci: Overview of Taxonomic and Nomenclature Changes
Facklam, R. (2002) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.15.4.613-630.2002 · Cited by 1,011
Molecular diagnosis of bacterial endocarditis by broad-range PCR amplification and direct sequencing
Goldenberger, D., Künzli, A., Vogt, P., Zbinden, R., & Altwegg, M. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.35.11.2733-2739.1997 · Cited by 390
Influence of saliva on the oral microbiota
Marsh, P. D., Do, T., Beighton, D., & Devine, D. A. (2016) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/prd.12098 · Cited by 381
Saliva-Bacterium Interactions in Oral Microbial Ecology
Scannapieco, F. A. (1994) · Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine · doi:10.1177/10454411940050030201 · Cited by 328
KILIAN, M., REINHOLDT, J., LOMHOLT, H., POULSEN, K., & FRANDSEN, E. V. G. (1996) · APMIS · doi:10.1111/j.1699-0463.1996.tb00724.x · Cited by 297
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- KILIAN, M., MIKKELSEN, L., & HENRICHSEN, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1989-10-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 471-484
- ISSN
- 0020-7713 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2102
- OpenAlex
- W2085116235
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 45.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Taxonomic Study of Viridans Streptococci: Description of Streptococcus gordonii sp. nov. and Emended Descriptions of Streptococcus sanguis (White and Niven 1946), Streptococcus oralis (Bridge and Sneath 1982), and Streptococcus mitis (Andrewes and Horder 1906). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00207713-39-4-471
- The paper
- KILIAN, M., MIKKELSEN, L., & HENRICHSEN, J. (1989). Taxonomic Study of Viridans Streptococci: Description of Streptococcus gordonii sp. nov. and Emended Descriptions of Streptococcus sanguis (White and Niven 1946), Streptococcus oralis (Bridge and Sneath 1982), and Streptococcus mitis (Andrewes and Horder 1906). International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-39-4-471
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.